Info from Larry Sinclair about that night with Obama in Chicago

Taken from;

http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com/

Everyone wanting to make this go away says there is no evidence. Obama supporters have continue to claim I was in a mental institution, even posted one post (but took it down just as quick) that I was in Federal Prison (until the realized the middle name and birth dates were wrong), among many, many other outright false statements about me.


My Hotel reservation was made through Choice Hotels International central reservations originally for November 3, 1999 thru November 6, 1999. Confirmation number 78096854.


My stay was extended from November 6, 1999 through November 9, 1999 directly through the hotel which generated Confirmation number 86467. While I extended originally through Nov 9, 1999, I actually left on Nov 8, 1999.


The limo and bar charges are on Visa card issued by Associates National Bank of Wilmington, Delaware (which was bought out by CitiBank in 2000) monthly statement closing date of November 15, 1999. Card number 4621-2001-3393-5533. Which Citi Group has been contacted and is researching for those statements. Because I unlike most of you internet warriors insist on putting out only factual information.


So any of you who think you now that I do not have any receipts, witnesses etc….. THINK AGAIN

Respectfully,

Larry Sinclair

Larry Sinclair talks about polygraph tests

From http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com/

TEST REPORTS

I am posting this to explain what I was saying last night concerning the reports of Ed Gelb. After reviewing his report (for the first time actually) I noticed that Mr. Gelb stated

"The Polygrams were "blind scored" by another expert examiner who independently corroborrated the findings of the primary examiner"

This if true would make Mr. Gelb and Mr. Parisi liars when they stated to me that the results would be reveiewed by no one other than Gelb and Gordon. And if that in fact is the case, then Gelbs claim shows the results were set up from the beginning because Gordon Barland had not even received the exam charts, video, etc...until Saturday or Monday at the latest in his Office in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Furthermore, Mr. Gelb signed his report on 2-22-08 according to the documents and his office, yet Parisi as late as this past Monday stated they had the results but the results had not been typed. Another lie on the part of Parisi. Especially since Barlands report states he had received PDF files and reports in the materials to review prepared by Gelb.

While I understand there are so many of you that will not look at any of this because you have made it clear that you would support Obama even if he was a child molester and/or murderer. Both of which so many of you have tried to call me, but everything put out about me continues to be false.


Whitehouse.com has pulled back because they (Parisi and Braddock) know that the information provided to me regarding the $750,000 payment by Axelrod/Obama is true. The know that the communications between Parisi and Axelrod on Sunday that were accessed did take place and they spent all day Monday trying to figure out how I obtain the information. Parisi is trying to do to me what Axelrod did to him. He is trying to stop payment on the check issued for the photos and video taping of the Polygraph, because Axelrod has not paid the other $375,000 due under their $750,000 deal.


The only difference is I provided to Parisi exactly what he contracted for, and if his check is returned unpaid, Mr. Parisi will face arrest for Felony Check Fraud and Theft charges.

New Larry Sinclair Polygraph results raise even more questions.

Look at the forth page. It states, "I also evaluated the second series using the computer algorithum PolyScore (v. 6.0). It evaluated the chart as No Deception Indicated, and calculated the probability of deception as being less that .01 on a scale of .00 to 1.00.This was inconsistent with my numerical analysis."












Was this Whitehouse.com, which used to be a porn site trying to set Mr. Sinclair up? They made him sign a contract stating he wouldn't take another polygraph for four weeks. I think in four weeks Senator Obama will be the Democratic nominnee for President.

Larry added this on his site;
http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com

This is to explain my position on the Barland QC report.


Barland was smart enough to point out the data that was and was not provided to him for review. He was smart enough to point out the uncommon methods used and the lack of control over the situation by Mr. Gelb.


Yes, Barland still concurs with Gelb, which I had no doubt he would under the circumstances, but he was smart enough to protect himself by pointing out concerns.

I also want people to look at the actions of Whitehouse.com over the last 24 hours alone, something is truly not right here.

You do not just up and shut down your operation and revamp it in the manner that Parisi has done. What is there to hide.

Was it not Parisi who said "Put up or Shut up?"

Why would you stop payment on a check that you pay for services and you received those services and then you claim you are entitled to because you think a breach of contract may occur at some future time. Mr. Parisi breached our agreement as early as Friday afternoon 2-22-08. I have not submitted to another polygraph, I stated I wanted to do another one in full disclosure which was what Parisi said he was doing and then did not.

Thank you,

Larry Sinclair

More email to/from Larry Sinclair and Mr. Parisi from Whitehouse.com just released

From:
The latest WH emails on Expert Reports and intent to commit check fraud

Lawrence Sinclair (lws)

Sent: Tue 2/26/08 3:01 PM
To: Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)
Cc: Rob Capriccioso (rob@bigheaddc.com)


I believe your refusal to post it will only allow others to believe you are in bed with Axelrod, you have already posted the photos, the drug test and Gelbs report so you not posting this one isn't going to stop you from legally owing me the funds you are now refusing to pay or from criminal charges for check fraud.

Thanks,

Larry Sinclair





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: No Polygraph
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:55:17 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws


We will not post the report. You will have it in about 30 minutes. Thanks



Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.





You have just stated that you are not paying for the rights so why are you reporting or posting any such claim?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: No Polygraph
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:47:14 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws


We just received the written results form Dr. Gordon Barland. As soon as we scan it we will forward copy to you. He concurred with Dr. Gelb. The last sentence reads as follows:



“Based upon my review of this examination, I concur in Mr. Gelb’s finding that Mr. Sinclair was not telling the complete truth in his claims to have engaged in oral sex with Senator Obama and that Senator Obama used cocaine in his presence. “



Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lawrence Sinclair [mailto:lws]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:39 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Cc:
Subject: RE: No Polygraph


No I have not, but have you seen any such polygraph test been done? Sir you can do what you want, you cannot say I have breached any agreement until I have actually done it. If you think that my expressing my desire to have a polygraph done in full disclosure constitutes a breech, then you go right ahead and refuse to honor your check, because in MN giving a bad check is a Felony and it is not excused by the maker claiming breech of contract. Presneting a check for services and not honoring that check is a CRIMINAL ACT and the maker of the check is civilly liable for three (3) times the amount of the check.

You either honor the check issued as payment for fee's or you face Felony check charges, I personally do not care. But you will not exploit my mothers situation and then make her physically ill because she see'e you stating you have stopped payment of the check based on a 'perceived' future breech.

Thank you

Larry Sinclair


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: RE: No Polygraph
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:29:58 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

Did you forget about this email you sent on 2/21 which I just took off your live.com page.


RE: Dear murray‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair (lws)

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 9:35 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)


If you want to do this without doing the 100K yes, Because even the part coming to me is going to pay my mothers back bills and medication so yes, if that is acceptable to you. You still have all exclusive rights to video as you want, and I still agree that no other polygraphs can be done for 4 weeks.
Dan Parisi
President
WhiteHouse.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lawrence Sinclair [mailto:lws
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:21 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: No Polygraph



No polygraph has been done and You changed the terms of the agreement on your own on 2-21-08 so your refusing to honor your payment sheds light on your intent.

You have no grounds to stop payment on what you think might happen when it has not happened.

If you decide that you are going to stop payment on the check that clearly states it is for 'fee' charged, then understand that by MN State law, I will be entitled to 3 times the amount of the original check.

Also, You posted my photographs which were acquired by and for the check for $20,000.00 as was the video tape and exam. Therefore, I am advising you that failure to honor your check will result in 'theft by Check' over $100,000 which is what could be made for the photos and video tape you acquired by fraud.

You can be a man and honor your agreement set forth by you on 2-21-08 and go about your business, or you can proceed with this fraud and deal with both civil and criminal actions against you and your company.

It is your choice.

WhiteHouse.com will not release video footage or final report of Mr. Sinclair's polygraph

According to WhiteHouse.com

"After the events of yesterday and this morning we will no longer be posting the video of the Polygraph testing or the secondary Polygrapher Expert’s results. To be accused of taking a bribe to suppress this story along with all of the hate mail and messages sent by Larry Sinclair supporters who believe we did something to taint the results has been very disturbing.

No matter what we put up it will never be good enough for his supporters. Mr. Sinclair was also given every opportunity to let us talk to the limousine driver to corroborate his story and he failed to do so. This will be the last post on this matter as this matter needs to be put to bed. We will be going back to regular reporting."

What are they hiding? They said they would disclose everything and they clearly haven't. We learned they are canceling the checks issued to Mr. Sinclair and earlier today I reported about how they used to be a porn site.

UPDATE

From:
The latest WH emails on Expert Reports and intent to commit check fraud

Lawrence Sinclair (lws)

Sent: Tue 2/26/08 3:01 PM
To: Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)
Cc: Rob Capriccioso (rob@bigheaddc.com)



I believe your refusal to post it will only allow others to believe you are in bed with Axelrod, you have already posted the photos, the drug test and Gelbs report so you not posting this one isn't going to stop you from legally owing me the funds you are now refusing to pay or from criminal charges for check fraud.

Thanks,

Larry Sinclair



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: No Polygraph
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:55:17 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

We will not post the report. You will have it in about 30 minutes. Thanks


Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.

WhiteHouse.com was a porn site until 2004

WhiteHouse.com was a porn site until 2004. Mr. Parisi used the name WhiteHouse.com to lure unsuspecting visitors into a porn site. It got so bad that in 1997 he was sent a letter from the real White House.

The White House
Washington

December 8, 1997

Mr. Dan Parisi
Secaucus, New Jersey

Dear Mr. Parisi:

It will come as no surprise to you that the White House Counsel's Office is aware of your Internet Web site, "www.whitehouse.com," and that we object to your use of the names and images of the White House, the President, and the First Lady on that Web site to sell memberships in an adult video club. We also recognize that you undoubtedly will use this letter as an object of humor and as an invitation to advance the claim that you are merely exercising your rights under the First Amendment.

We too believe in the First Amendment--and in humor, although we see nothing humorous in your use of the White House domain name to draw children and other unwitting Internet users to your Web site. However distasteful your business may be, we do not challenge your right to pursue it or to exercise your First Amendment rights, but we do challenge your right to use the White House, the President, and the First Lady as a marketing device. For adult internet users, that device is, at the least, part of a deceptive scheme. For younger Internet users, it has more disturbing consequences. As your own online disclaimer implicitly acknowledges, the foreseeable result of your use of the White House domain name is that children will access your Web site inadvertently. Your customers will understand that such a result is unconscionable, and so, we submit, should you.

Sincerely,

Charles F.C. Ruff
Counsel to the President
http://www.news.com/2009-1023-207800.html?legacy=cnet

According to archived CNN.com artlcle;
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/02/10/whitehouse.com.ap/

Mr. Parisi the owner decided to make a change with the site when his son started kindergarten in 2004. He initally decided to sell it then changed his mind and kept it with a different theme. In November 2005 it became a real estate site. In March 2006 it became a "Free Speech Forum". July 2006 saw it go back to a real estate site. Novemeber 2006 it became a search engine for people. Only in June of 2007 did they start covering politics. It even says on the "About Us" section (pictured below)that "We are rebranding and relaunching as a Political/News/ Entertainment site in January 2008."



Now this same man and site is coming under fire for not being forthright with the way they handled Larry Sinclair. They offered him a challenge to take a polygraph and release all the findings on the site. They did release some of the "findings" but not after stringing everyone along for a few days. Mr. Sinclair claims that Dr. Gelb, who isn't even a doctor walked away from him several times and talked to Mr. Parisi in private. Mr. Sinclair was kept out of the loop for days and now there are allegations that Mr. Parisi took money from Senator Obama's campaign to get the desired results.

WhiteHouse.com cancels checks issued to Larry Sinclair because he is taking a new polygraph today

This is an email that was just sent to me from Mr. Sinclair;

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE BELOW PASTED EMAIL FROM DAN PARISI MAKES IT CLEAR THIS MAN IS A FRAUD, HE HAS NOTIFIED ME THAT HIS CHECK WILL NOT BE HONORED. I HAVE ADVISED HIM THAT I WILL FILE A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAISNT HIM IF THIS CHECK IS RETURNED UNPAID.



From: Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)
Sent: Tue 2/26/08 12:05 PM
To: Lawrence Sinclair (lws)


I saw this interview this morning and posted your response in regards to another polygraph test. It shows that you are doing another polygraph with results in this afternoon in violation of our agreement. I have instructed bank to stop payment on the $20,000 check this morning. The $10,000 in checks going to the charities are not effected and will be paid.
LS: I will continue to put my story out there. I am getting some assistance in amending the lawsuit for refiling, and please note, it has not yet been dismissed, nor has the recommendation to dismiss been received or written as claimed by the judge identified on the Web. I am not going away, I am not recanting anything, and I am fighting on, especially with the tip I received this date. I will do a polygraph arranged by me, video tape it non-edited and with the findings released before stopping the camera and will post it before Tuesday if all goes well.

Dan Parisi
President