Monday, February 25, 2008

Released emails from WhiteHouse.com to/from Larry Sinclair

RE: Polygraph Offer‏
ALL EMAILS TO/FROM PARISI

From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Sat 2/16/08 11:10 AM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair


We will post the following sentence on the website including a copy of our offer to you with all the address and email information blocked out. “We are not affiliated in any way with any of the candidates or any of the parties. I have never met or communicated with David Axelrod or Barack Obama. Obviously since I never have met either of them I do not have friendship with either of them”.

We are trying to get Jack Trimarco which is who was your first choice anyway. If we cannot get him we will agree to get another world renowned expert which is mutually agreeable to both us.

Airfare and Transportation will be paid for but we will make the arrangements and pay for the services directly with the Airlines, Ground Transportation and Hotels. We can provide security during the test and when we pick you up in a Limo. All other times are not feasible. We might just do the test at your apartment as long as we are the only ones recording or videotaping the event that way there are no travel of security issues.

We will pay you the $10,000 when you arrive at the office or where you are to take the test at the scheduled time as you want but if you do not complete the test we would want the money back. As you know off reading the information on Mr. Trimarco’s site, a good polygraph test and prep takes about 4-5 hours.

You can bring an independent reporter/witness at their expense .We will be the only ones to record or videotape the event.

We will not make your time and date for your test public anytime before or during the test or we will pay you the $10,000. We cannot be responsible if someone else not on the Whitehouse.com staff including somebody on your side leaks or posts the information. It is not in our interest to leak any of the information prior or during the event.

Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

From: Lawrence Sinclair [mailto:lws022737@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 11:05 AM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: Polygraph Offer

I stated on your web site that I would agree to your offer with conditions. You can accept them or not it is your choice.

1. You must publicly acknowledge any relationship you have or had with David Axelrod or Barack Obama, if any, including friendships.

2. I pick the polygraph examiner and it must be shown they have no connections with any candidate of either party.

3. Airfare and transportation to and from the airport to hotel and your office is paid by Whitehouse.com in advance as are hotel arrangements and whitehouse.com pays for security to insure my safety due to the threats being level against me even from your web sites.

4. Payment of the Ten Thousand dollars ($10,000.00) must be made at the time of arrival at your offices not upon completion of the exam because their are no assurance that you will pay at the end of exam.

5. I am allowed to have an independent report with me at and during the polygraph exam through its entirity as witness.

6. My arrival date and time is not to be made public at any time and if it is, you will agree to pay the Ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) in default for placing my life in danger.

If you agree then I will notify you of the flight information for you to take care of the payment of such.

RE: Polygraph Offer‏


From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Sat 2/16/08 11:32 AM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair



We are good to go. I will get the arrangements over to you early in the week. Can you put on your You Tube account that we have come to an agreement and I will do the same on Whitehouse.com. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

WHiteHouse.com Inc.

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 12:25 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Polygraph Offer

This is acceptable to me. The test is to be done in New York. I am having enough problems at my apartment since the posting of my address and phone number on the web. I perfer to get this done as quickly as possible. The name of travel documents needs to be Lawrence (not Larry) Sinclair as that is how it appears on my passport and ID.

I assure you there is no one on my side to leak anything.

RE: Scheduling of polygraph‏


From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Sun 2/17/08 12:45 PM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair



We are going to try to get something scheduled by tomorrow. It is tough to get things done on the weekend. I will keep you posted when we have a date and time. Thanks

Dan Parisi

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 3:54 AM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: Scheduling of polygraph

I would like you to set this up as quickly as possible and if you can get this scheduled this week I am available to get this done.

I am confident that I will prevail and the sooner I do the sooner I can put a stop to a lot of these threats and this non-stop harrassment.

I appologize for my implying that you were connected with Axelrod or Obama, as it has it one of my supporters emailed me to inform me that he felt you are on the level and that there is no evidence to support any connection.

Thank you,


Lawrence (Larry) Sinclair

RE: Trimarco‏


From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Mon 2/18/08 10:27 AM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair



It is not a good idea to contact these people directly or post on boards which people are being contacted to administer the tests. This will interfere with us getting somebody for the tests. We are in the process today of getting someone to administer the test. Thanks

Dan Parisi

WhiteHouse.com

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 9:22 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: Trimarco

Based on Mr. Trimarcos contacting me and informing me he would respectfully decline administering the exam, I will assume that you can locate someone in your area that will meet the objective, unbiased, independent examiner.

RE: Trimarco‏


From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Mon 2/18/08 3:44 PM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair



We have Dr. Ed Gelb. He is a world renowned Polygraph expert. He can do it either on Friday or Saturday at his Offices in Los Angeles. We can make travel and hotel arrangements for you as soon as you give us which day is better. He has done testing in other high profile cases before and he was the Polygraph expert hired to verify the DC Madam’s allegations. His website is http://polygraphexpert.com/.

Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 1:07 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Trimarco

I contacted Mr. Trimarco before you had made your offer. I am not posting any thing, I had posted on youtube Friday morning that I had left a message for Mr. Trimarco. I will not post any others as I have not contacted any others since becoming aware of your offer.

Respectfully,

Lawrence Sinclair

RE: Trimarco‏


From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Mon 2/18/08 3:58 PM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair



I will have my assistant Editor Rob Braddock call you in 30 minutes and set everything up. He is from Los Angeles and he is knowledgeable on the hotels and the area.

Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 4:49 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Trimarco

Make the arrangements for departure from Duluth on Thursday, we will do the exam on friday and I return to duluth on Saturday..

If possible I would appreciate a non stop flight from Minneapolis to LAX for medical reasons. Contact via email or call me at 218-xxx-xxxx or my cell phone at 612-xxx-xxxx.

Thank you. RE: Trimarco‏


From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Mon 2/18/08 5:43 PM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair
Cc:
Rob Braddock (RBraddock@house.com)



Here is the air and Hotel information. Robert had talked that we will pick you at 2:00 on Thursday afternoon and we will drive together to airport and fly over to LA. You appointment is set with Dr. Gelb at 11:00 AM. on Friday. We will all drive to his office together as we will be staying at the same hotel. As Robert explained Dr. Gelb will also take a urine sample for drug testing. You had mentioned to Robert that you will be bringing all receipts and documentation in regards to the case. You have Robert’s number if you need to reach him and obviously we will be in communication between now and when we pick you up. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

WhiteHouse.com Inc.

Trip name: Los Angeles 2/21/08
Orbitz record locator: HHTG5T
Guest name: Larry Sinclair

Hotel name: Wilshire Grand Los Angeles
Address:
930 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA, US 90017
Phone number: 1-213-xxx-7777
Check-in date: Thu, Feb 21, 2008 (3:00 PM)
Check-out date: Sat, Feb 23, 2008 (12 Noon)
Total number of guests: 2
Total number of rooms: 1 room
Special Room - 2 double bed or 1 king bed
Special Requests: This property is entirely smoke-free, Non-smoking room


Passenger(s): LAWRENCE SINCLAIR

Northwest Airlines record locator: 4ZAWV9
Ticket type requested: electronic (e-ticket)
Orbitz record locator: AP1801014ZAWV930
Airline ticket number(s): 0127203581861
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Northwest Airlines # 309

Duluth International (DLH) to Minneapolis St Paul Intl (MSP)
Departure (DLH): February 21, 5:10 PM CST (evening)
Arrival (MSP): February 21, 6:02 PM CST (evening)
Class: Economy

Seat request: choose seats
| MSP
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Northwest Airlines # 309

Minneapolis St Paul Intl (MSP) to Los Angeles International (LAX)
Departure (MSP): February 21, 7:10 PM CST (evening)
Arrival (LAX): February 21, 9:15 PM PST (evening)




Seat request: choose seats
View real-time airport conditions and traveler updates at MSP | LAX
--------------------------------

Saturday, February 23, 2008
Northwest Airlines # 312

Los Angeles International (LAX) to Minneapolis St Paul Intl (MSP)
Departure (LAX): February 23, 12:15 PM PST (afternoon)
Arrival (MSP): February 23, 5:51 PM CST (evening)
Class: Economy

Seat request: choose seats
View real-time airport conditions and traveler updates at LAX | MSP
Saturday, February 23, 2008
Northwest Airlines # 1634

Minneapolis St Paul Intl (MSP) to Duluth International (DLH)
Departure (MSP): February 23, 9:33 PM CST (evening)
Arrival (DLH): February 23, 10:21 PM CST (evening)





From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 4:59 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Trimarco

Ok, thats fine.

Good you did, I hung up on Warner Bros Television this morning.


Subject: RE: Trimarco
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:58:01 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

I will have my assistant Editor Rob Braddock call you in 30 minutes and set everything up. He is from Los Angeles and he is knowledgeable on the hotels and the area.

Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 4:49 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Trimarco

Make the arrangements for departure from Duluth on Thursday, we will do the exam on friday and I return to duluth on Saturday..

If possible I would appreciate a non stop flight from Minneapolis to LAX for medical reasons. Contact via email or call me at 218-xxx-xxxx or my cell phone at 612-xxx-xxxx.

Thank you.

RE: Trimarco‏


From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Tue 2/19/08 11:19 AM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair


I wanted to make sure you received the travel arrangements we sent you last night. We also going to be a doing a posting on the website today that you will be taking the test next Tuesday in New York City to throw everybody off from the test we have scheduled. Thanks

Dan Parisi

Whitehouse.com

RE: Trimarco‏


From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Tue 2/19/08 12:59 PM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair



We will check the IP address of the guy. We will change the hotel as well to a hotel where there is smoking and non smoking rooms. Thanks

Dan Parisi

Whitehouse.com Inc.

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 1:47 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Trimarco

Yes, Rob spoke with me and that is fine. I would like to ask that if possible, Whitehouse find out who the dear murray dot com is and who his server is because he is turning into a stalker and it is starting to truly concern me.

I assume Rob or you have printed the e-tickets for the flight? Correct?

Also, There is NO mental health issues as being claimed by Murray and the others.

I have with my doctors permission stooped taking all narcotic pain medications since Saturday so as no one can claim I was medicated to alter the results of the polygraph. I want this to be as credible as possible.

Thank you,


Lawrence Sinclair

RE: Dear murray‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 9:29 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)



Have Rob call me I have a different figure in mind and part of that figure I would want split into two separate certified or cashiers checks payable to two charities. It will still be a lot less than you will lose when I pass this test. Add 10K to what you suggests and have 5k each payable to the following

1. Duluth Salvation Army Housing Loan Program

and

2. Girls and Boys Club of Duluth

Let me know what you think?







Subject: RE: Dear murray
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:42:04 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

If you want we can do this. We give you 20k either way instead of the way we have it and maybe you give $2,000 or 10% to charity. If you do that way then you get rid of all these bribe accusations. You will also look very good to the media and public as well. Thanks

Dan Parisi

Whitehouse.com

From: Lawrence Sinclair [mailto:
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:03 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: Dear murray


dear murray is posting on WH under the user name hahahaha stating you are "you are bribbing me to pass polygraph" and he is consulting his attorney whether your actions constitute a federal crime.



RE: Dear murray‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 9:35 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)


If you want to do this without doing the 100K yes, Because even the part coming to me is going to pay my mothers back bills and medication so yes, if that is acceptable to you. You still have all exclusive rights to video as you want, and I still agree that no other polygraphs can be done for 4 weeks.






Subject: RE: Dear murray
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:31:06 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws


Are you saying 20k to you and 5k each to the following two strategies. Thanks

Dan P




RE: Dear murray‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair )

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 9:44 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)


This will be announced by both of us jointly after the test is done and I am home safely. I have to get things ready here for my departure. Will talk later.






Subject: RE: Dear murray
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:41:31 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws


That s fine. We will bring all three company checks tomorrow to the testing. They will not be certified but we are a big organization here so I do not see where there is any issue. They will be Whitehouse.com Inc checks signed by me. Thanks

Dan Parisi

Whitehouse.com

RE: Dear murray‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 10:01 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)


You can post that if you send it to me to view prior to posting. Also I would appreciate it if you would make the point that the flat fee is for the rights to video tape and broadcast exclusively.






Subject: RE: Dear murray
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:58:52 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

We will have final results in on Monday so you will be home by then. As soon as we have the results we will let you know what the verbal results are. We can then both go out at same time with results but whitehouse.com will be the only ones with the written results and video which we will post on Whitehouse.com site. I would like to post a story this afternoon saying how you are not taking one flat fee for taking the test with 1/3 going to charity as you really want to get your story out and you do not want any taint of you being paid extra to get a positive result with leaving the test times as still being next Tuesday. We will not name the amounts. I think that would be a very positive thing to do. Thanks

Dan P



RE: Dear murray‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 10:10 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)


You can post this afternoon what you wanted to post, after all this is a business that you need to continue operating in the best possible light to continue to be profitable, I just do not want anyone saying I am charging to agree to take the polygraph. I am indebted for all the attention you have brought to this issue.






Subject: RE: Dear murray
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:07:24 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

We will send you copy to look at before we post it. We will probably not post anything on it until we get back from the trip. Thanks

Dan P

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 1:43 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)



There is a problem with the wording as follows "If he passes......." The agreement is rather than put a price on passing we agreed to a flat fee of which 10k goes to charities listed. Only change Salvation Army Housing Loan Program to the Salvation Army, because that way they can use the money where ever they have the greatest need.

That is the only problem I see is the word "If".






Subject: RE: Dear murray
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:48:41 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

How is this for a posting.

Larry Sinclair wants to change the payout of our polygraph challenge

and we've agreed. If he passes the test, he wants only enough money to

pay off some outstanding debt of his mother's for the exclusive rights

to the video and results. He also wants $10,000 paid out to a couple of Minnesota

charities: the Duluth Salvation Army Housing Loan Program and the

Girls and Boys Club of Duluth. That seems perfectly reasonable to us

the most penny-pinching of free spenders, and so we've agreed.


We'd like to note at this point that our fascination with Sinclair's

claims doesn't have much to do with Barack Obama. We'd just as soon

take on any other candidate, and, in fact, we already have.


To reiterate the statement we made before, WhiteHouse.com, nor any

of it's writers or staff are in any way affiliated with any of the

presidential campaigns and, along those same lines, we are in no way

a subsidiary of or contractor for the CIA or any such organization, as has

been suggested. We lay no claim to any ideological agenda; ours is to to

seek out the truth in this bizarre story.Any suggestion to the contrary is

conspiracy theory or wishful thinking or both.

Thanks

Dan Parisi

Whitehouse.com Inc.



From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sat 2/23/08 4:47 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)


I am prepared to give you the chance to save $2500 by you providing me with $2500 cash and re-writing the $20,000.00 check for $15,000.00 check and I return to you the $20,000.00 check so that I can remain here un til monday morning and I pay the cost from saturday thru Monday myself to get this out in the MSM.

I will need you to respond by 1:00 PM today. That is a savings to you of an additional $2500.00 dollars.

Please contact me by calling the room at x 207 or pounding on the room door.

Thank you

Larry Sinclair

Questions‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 12:11 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)




Is there a reason that Murray would be in LA, know where I was staying and even know that I went to dinner last night with a couple of friend that you can explain to me?

Why did you fail to mention when I called this afternoon you posted my drug test results? Or fail to mention to me that you had received the results?

The hotel records were shown to you at your request, however I made it clear no one was posting those on the web. Our arrangement in fact did not even seek any of the records I provided you. I do hope that you are going to honor our agreement.

I also am starting to feel a little uneasy with the amount of time you guys spent with Dr. Gelf outside my pressence. I am simply stating a fact that I am beginning to feel a little uneasy because of that and the manner inwhich you guys are posting stuff.

Maybe is is just my being tired.

(No Subject)‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 11:43 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)



I at no time have told you I would give you the limo drivers number. I at no time made any promises to you about the driver. I am being asked here by a local reporter if I have any reason to believe the checks payable from you on the charties are not good. I told her that you assured me they are good.

RE: Questions‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair (lws022737@hotmail.com)

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 11:49 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)




So you have had Dr. Gelbs results as I expected since Friday. I do want the name of the second expert. Oh I believe you say would you provide me a copy of these results, those from the experts.




Subject: RE: Questions
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:12:57 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

We are going to be releasing the results of the two polygraph tests taken on Friday today at 11:30 EST. They are the results provided by Dr. Gelb. We will post the results of the second Polygraph examiner when we receive them. Thanks

Dan Parisi

Whitehouse.com



RE: Questions‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 11:51 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)



Excuse me Mr. Parisi, I NEVER SAID I WOULD HAVE THE LIMO DRIVER IN CONTACT WITH YOU, so please do not start making such claims. I said I would ask the driver if he wanted to speak with you.





Subject: RE: Questions
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:33:49 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To:


Since you have not gotten back to us we have moved back the release of the test results to Noon today EST which is about 30 minutes from now. You had said you would have had the limousine driver in contact with us by now but we have not heard anything on that either. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.



RE: Questions‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 12:17 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)



I told you and Rob I would try to put you in contact with the driver. Last night when I spoke with you I told you I would deal with calling the driver today, I did not tell you I would put you or anyone else in contact with him by 12:00 noon. You said you would call me at 12 noon ET. today.



Subject: RE: Questions
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:14:36 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To:


You told both me and Rob in person that you were going to put us in contact with the limousine driver. You told me last night you were going to do it today. I said 12:00 Noon and you agreed. 12:00:00 PM has come and gone. We have not heard anything on the limo driver. Thanks

Dan P



RE: Questions‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 12:20 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)


No, I can not and will not, you are posting that I lied, why would I put him in the middle of your firestorm now.



Subject: RE: Questions
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:19:16 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To:

It is past 12:00. We called you several times already today. Can you put us in touch with him now. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.



RE: Questions‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 12:37 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)



Mr. Parisi, I told you I would contact the driver. Now lets not get into you building this up anyway you want. I never said I would make this man talk to you. I have all my communiction with you.





Subject: RE: Questions
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:26:49 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To:


As we spoke about on Friday. You had mentioned that the driver called Obama on Saturday November 6 from his cell phone and later Obama himself made a call on his cell phone to procure the drugs. If that was true you would then have 2 cell phone records for that date so there is no reason for the driver to be hiding. Also if he was indeed a friend of Obama that would come out as well. You told us you were going to put us in touch with him to corroborate your story and you did not. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.



RE: Questions‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 4:16 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)


I will expect a copy of the written results. I never stated that you were to give me the original results. I stated clearly in my email to you accepting your offer the conditions which included a copy of the results being made available to me. And I have to wait 4 weeks before I can do another polygraph with anyone else.

As long as we live up to the agreement we are fine. I have placed a call to him that has not been returned.




Subject: RE: Questions
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:10:52 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To:

We are not going to bounce any of the checks. What news organization are you giving the charity checks to. In my email to you on Thursday. I said “As soon as we have the results we will let you know what the verbal results are. We can then both go out at same time with results but whitehouse.com will be the only ones with the written results and video which we will post on Whitehouse.com site.” I think that is pretty clear we will be keeping written results. We have no problem sending you a copy of the written results as we will post them on the website. We are still waiting for a typed copy of the report as we only have a handwritten copy which was faxed this afternoon to us. As soon as we receive the typed report we will fax it over to you. Have you gotten in touch with Limousine driver so we can talk to him. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

WhiteHouse.com Inc.

From: Lawrence Sinclair [mailto:lws022737@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 1:42 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Questions


The charities are concerned about the checks you wrote not being honorred. I would appreciate you emailing me a statement or posting one on your site making it clear that the checks issued by Whitehouse dor com are good and will be honorred.

Thank you.

Larry Sinclair



RE: Questions‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 4:19 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)


I do not understand why you are not willing to fax or attach to an email the handwritten results as well, but whatever. You answered the more important question. I am giving the checks to a local reporter with NBC 6, there is going to be no part of the Obama thing reported on, she is going to present the checks for me to both on Monday. I am not even going to be there. Her name is M. Lee and they are not mentioning the Obama thing at all. It is a simple pay it forward story.

Can you explain the below email received in youtube email box to me‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 8:47 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)




fyi

www.antipolygraph.com/articles/article-036.shtml Gelb has
publicly claimed to hold a Ph.D. degree in psychology since at least
1996. I***997, he represented himself as a Ph.D. to the highest court
in the land -- the United States Supreme Court -- as a co-signer of
the Committee of Concerned Social Scientists' amicus brief in U.S. v.
Scheffer, where he is listed as "Ed Gelb, Ph.D." No, the "LaSalle
University" that awarded Gelb his "doctorate" turns out to be a
defunct, unaccredited diploma mill in Mandeville, Louisiana that was
owned and operated by one Thomas James Kirk, A.K.A. Thomas McPherson.
I***996, LaSalle was raided by the FBI, and i***997 Kirk pled guilty
to federal fraud charges. (For more on the bogus LaSalle
University, Mr. Edward I. Gelb is no Ph.D., and he should stop
masquerading as such.


(No Subject)‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Mon 2/25/08 1:46 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)



So you were in fact hired by Mr. Axelrod after all. You think $750,000 is enough money to protect your interests from all the crap that is going to hit over this little piece of information I was sent this morning?

I am releasing all our email communication later along with the information about WH and Axelrods little dispute over the matter of you not being paid all of your money and over you not posting everything that was asked of you as fast as they asked you to.

And I will be contacting Mr. Gelb who turns out not to be a DR after all.

I hope just one of your checks fails to be honored by the bank, because that will give me the personal determination to shut you down.

Looks like you are exactly what I figured you to be from the start.

You can say whatever you want, I do not believe a word out of your mouth now.

Be ready to disclose all your accounts and businesses.

Sincerely


Larry Sinclair

RE: Here are the typed Polygrpah reports‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Mon 2/25/08 2:46 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)




I assume by your failure to reply you are denying prior knowledge of misrepresentations by Mr. Gelb and the information I received early this morning advising me that you were paid $750,000 by Axelrod associates to set me up? Do I assume correctly.

Subject: Here are the typed Polygrpah reports
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:09:32 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws0
Here are the links to the typed polygraph reports. We will be posting them on the site in about 5 minutes. You can access them now before the general public gets the link. Thanks


Larry Sinclair's official polygraph results from controversial Dr. Gelb

p1

p2

p3

p4

Larry is not backing down

Today it has surfaced on the internet that Mr. Sinclair apologized and confessed he was lying in the following statment;

This is Larry Sinclair. First. I am posting this message in venues where I know my situation is discussed.First off, let me apologize for the roller coaster ride I have put some of you through(myself included). I have been going through various issues as of late, and have been having quite a tough time. I sincerely appreciate all the support I have received from ALL OF YOU(you know who you are). However, I think it's time this all was finished. I was not being honest. I did not give oral sex to Barak Obama, nor have I ever met him. I have just been extremely lonely lately, and I guess I needed attention. I want to assure you all the money I recieved from this(both from whitehouse.com and The Globe Magazine) will ALL go to charity. When all is said and done, I will NOT HAVE PROFITED from this. Now that I have disclosed this, I hope you all will respect my right to privacy, and let it rest. I have made some good friends during this, and will always cherish and respect the ones who have helped me.

Thank you,
Larry Sinclair

This is not from Larry he just sent me an email and asked me to let everyone know that this did not come from him and it is a hoax. He is going to keep fighting.

Larry Sinclair's initial email to Obama's campaign

Sent: Mon 2/04/08 11:43 PM
To: info@akpmedia.com

This message is for David Axelrod. My name is Larry Sinclair. Attempts to leave messages for you with the Obama headquarters have not gone well.

I have been informed that you personally have stated the claims in my youtube video are untrue. I also understand that you personally in your capacity with the Obama camp has stated the Obama camp is conducting an investigation into me and my associates.

I have contacted legal counsel and have asked that civile litigation be filed forthwith against you and the Obama camp for conducting investigations in an attempt to prevent my truthful allegations against your candidate from becoming public and a national scale. I am also asking counsel to take action to determine if you and or the Obama camp have violated any federal or state laws in the funding of your invesstigation and/or attempts to keep the truth out of the election process.

Understand all you have to do is ask me about me, because I have been 100% open and honest about my life and every aspect of it.

I am sick of threats being sent by Obama staff and supporters, I am sick of Obama bloggers using edited versions of my video to slam other candidates who have nothing to do with me or my video.

I have notified the DNC that I intend to take action against them as well for ignoring complaint filed by me with them regarding your statements about the purpose for the posting of my video.

Understand you do not know me, and I assure you I will stand my ground on this, and I will defend myself against the false claims being made against me by you, Obama's camp, paid or unpaid staffers, and Mr. Obama personally if I find him to have knowledge of your actions.

I suggest you address this matter because I assure you it will not be going away anytime soon.

Larry Sinclair goes on the offensive

This was sent to me by Mr. Sinclair about an hour ago.

THE FOLLOWING WAS POSTED BY ME ON WHITEHOUSE DOT COM A FEW MOMENTS AGO. MR. PARISI HAS FAILED TO REPLY TOANY EMAILS SENT HIM SINCE YESTERDAY AFTERNOON. I AM CONTACTING THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION THIS DATE HAS WELL.


Obama and Axelrod are paying $750,000 to WH's Dan Parisi for this
scam he set up which is now falling apart in front of his eyes. It
is amazing what kind of information people send you when they see you
being screwed over. I am posting all email communications between
Parisi and I at larrysinclair0926dotspacesdotlive*** in a couple of
hours. I am doing so because Parisi has failed to adhere to terms of
the agreement and his terms will mke it clear the info I received
early this morning fits perfectly with his desire to prevent me from
going to another polygraph expert before the primaries.

Statement from Larry Sinclair concerning alleged failed polygraph

STATEMENT FROM LARRY SINCLAIR

I am making this statement regarding the claims recently made against me and attributted to the WASHINGTON POST.

FIRST

The claims that I have an “extensive record of drug convictions” is in fact completely false and according to both the national new desk and city desk at the Washington Post has never been reported by anyone employed at this newspaper.

SECOND

The claims made that I “have been investigated eight times over the past 25 years for trying to secure money through “black male” and two of those involving politicians in IL and IN” also is in fact false and according to the Washington Post has never been reported by anyone employed at this newspaper.

THIRD

Dan Parisi of Whitehouse dot com has decided to ignore the conditions and agreement we entered into regarding the polygraph examination. Mr. Parisis has failed to provide the identity and contact information on the second Expert and in doing so has never obtained any agreement from me for using this individual.

Mr. Parisi failed to provide information that I recently received from emails from people I do not even know, which shows Dr. Edward Ira Gelb has in fact misrepresented his own credentials before a case filed in front of the US Supreme Court. (attached below)

fyi

www.antipolygraph.com/articles/article-036.shtml Gelb has
publicly claimed to hold a Ph.D. degree in psychology since at least
1996. I***997, he represented himself as a Ph.D. to the highest court
in the land -- the United States Supreme Court -- as a co-signer of
the Committee of Concerned Social Scientists' amicus brief in U.S. v.
Scheffer, where he is listed as "Ed Gelb, Ph.D." No, the "LaSalle
University" that awarded Gelb his "doctorate" turns out to be a
defunct, unaccredited diploma mill in Mandeville, Louisiana that was
owned and operated by one Thomas James Kirk, A.K.A. Thomas McPherson.
I***996, LaSalle was raided by the FBI, and i***997 Kirk pled guilty
to federal fraud charges. (For more on the bogus LaSalle
University, Mr. Edward I. Gelb is no Ph.D., and he should stop
masquerading as such.

In addition Mr. Parisi and his assistant refused to inform or allow me to be present during their meetings with Dr. Gelb in his office before, during and after the exams. Mr. Parisi and his assistant spent approximately two hours behind closed doors with Dr. Gelb before I was even introduced to him. During the examination process Dr. Gelb printed something off his computer and left the room telling me he would be back in five, only to return some 30 to 45 minutes later with Parisi’s assistant and an associate of Dr. Gelbs and then asked me to step out side for another 20 minutes before calling me back in to proceed with the exam.

FOURTH

Tonight (2-24-08) after Mr. Parisi refused to respond to my emails I posted on Whitehouse dot com the fact that Parisi this afternoon claimed he had not sent me copy of the results because he had not received them. Shortly after making that statement this afternoon Parisi’s assistant called saying they would fax the results in 15 minute, needless to say that never happened. Later Parisi claimed he had only then received a handwritten report faxed this date to him from Dr. Gelb and that he would wait to fax me the typed report.


If Mr. Parisi fails to comply with our agreement by Monday 2-25-08 I will post all email communications with him concerning this matter and which clearly state the conditions for this arrangement. These emails will clearly show Mr. Parisi did not follow our agreement and I will consider at that time what course of action should be taken. It is only natural that I would become suspicious of Mr. Parisi after finding out he has misrepresented this expert, he has claimed I was examined by two (2) experts of which I agreed and yet I only met one and still have not been given the contact information to this date on the second.


It needs to be made perfectly clear that I have from the very beginning demand all of this be done openly and with credible, unbiased, and apolitical individuals. These facts about Dr. Gelb make it hard for me to believe that Mr. Parisi can claim this person is unbiased and credible when he has misrepresented himself before the highest court in this Country.

Mr. Parisi’s claims that I approved both experts is untrue because I was never given this person whole name or any contact information on him/her. I was simply told Gordo something in Salt Lake City.


Thank you,

Larry Sinclair
2-24-08

In the email I received from Mr. Sinclair he says the following;

"I have receive a tip informing me that some communications between David Axelrod and Whitehouse dot com was obtained and was some wrangling over the fact that WH has not posted everything that Obama's camp wanted posted as fast as they wanted and about half of the $750,000 paid to WH to set me up has yet to be paid because of this delay. Mr. Parisi is not happy at all.

This may also explain why Parisi went out of his way to keep his face down and not looking up at me the entire time.

Well, I guess now we will just have to follow the money trial."
Larry Sinclair comes clean about his crimial record. Read about it in the latest update.

http://mrsircy.blogspot.com/2008/03/larry-sinclair-comes-clean-about-his.html
Google
 

VerveEarth

Quick Linker