More email to/from Larry Sinclair and Mr. Parisi from Whitehouse.com just released

From:
The latest WH emails on Expert Reports and intent to commit check fraud

Lawrence Sinclair (lws)

Sent: Tue 2/26/08 3:01 PM
To: Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)
Cc: Rob Capriccioso (rob@bigheaddc.com)


I believe your refusal to post it will only allow others to believe you are in bed with Axelrod, you have already posted the photos, the drug test and Gelbs report so you not posting this one isn't going to stop you from legally owing me the funds you are now refusing to pay or from criminal charges for check fraud.

Thanks,

Larry Sinclair





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: No Polygraph
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:55:17 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws


We will not post the report. You will have it in about 30 minutes. Thanks



Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.





You have just stated that you are not paying for the rights so why are you reporting or posting any such claim?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: No Polygraph
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:47:14 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws


We just received the written results form Dr. Gordon Barland. As soon as we scan it we will forward copy to you. He concurred with Dr. Gelb. The last sentence reads as follows:



“Based upon my review of this examination, I concur in Mr. Gelb’s finding that Mr. Sinclair was not telling the complete truth in his claims to have engaged in oral sex with Senator Obama and that Senator Obama used cocaine in his presence. “



Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lawrence Sinclair [mailto:lws]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:39 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Cc:
Subject: RE: No Polygraph


No I have not, but have you seen any such polygraph test been done? Sir you can do what you want, you cannot say I have breached any agreement until I have actually done it. If you think that my expressing my desire to have a polygraph done in full disclosure constitutes a breech, then you go right ahead and refuse to honor your check, because in MN giving a bad check is a Felony and it is not excused by the maker claiming breech of contract. Presneting a check for services and not honoring that check is a CRIMINAL ACT and the maker of the check is civilly liable for three (3) times the amount of the check.

You either honor the check issued as payment for fee's or you face Felony check charges, I personally do not care. But you will not exploit my mothers situation and then make her physically ill because she see'e you stating you have stopped payment of the check based on a 'perceived' future breech.

Thank you

Larry Sinclair


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: RE: No Polygraph
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:29:58 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

Did you forget about this email you sent on 2/21 which I just took off your live.com page.


RE: Dear murray‏


From:
Lawrence Sinclair (lws)

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 9:35 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)


If you want to do this without doing the 100K yes, Because even the part coming to me is going to pay my mothers back bills and medication so yes, if that is acceptable to you. You still have all exclusive rights to video as you want, and I still agree that no other polygraphs can be done for 4 weeks.
Dan Parisi
President
WhiteHouse.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lawrence Sinclair [mailto:lws
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:21 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: No Polygraph



No polygraph has been done and You changed the terms of the agreement on your own on 2-21-08 so your refusing to honor your payment sheds light on your intent.

You have no grounds to stop payment on what you think might happen when it has not happened.

If you decide that you are going to stop payment on the check that clearly states it is for 'fee' charged, then understand that by MN State law, I will be entitled to 3 times the amount of the original check.

Also, You posted my photographs which were acquired by and for the check for $20,000.00 as was the video tape and exam. Therefore, I am advising you that failure to honor your check will result in 'theft by Check' over $100,000 which is what could be made for the photos and video tape you acquired by fraud.

You can be a man and honor your agreement set forth by you on 2-21-08 and go about your business, or you can proceed with this fraud and deal with both civil and criminal actions against you and your company.

It is your choice.