According to Mr. Sinclair's MSN page;
http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com/
The following letter has been written to the Obama campaign and is being mailed on Monday. He is basically calling them out on the allegations that they paid off Whitehouse.com and asks them to disclose financial records to prove it.
March 2, 2008
Senator Barack Obama
713 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Senator Barack Obama
230 S. Dearborn Street, Ste. 3900
Chicago, IL 60604
Mr. David Axelrod
AKP Message & Media
730 N. Franklin Street, Ste. 404
Chicago, IL 60610
RE: Questions
Dear Senator Obama and Mr. Axelrod:
I am writing the two of you this letter because phone calls continue to be ignored. I feel it is only fair that I address the following questions to the two of you directly one last time.
1. Who is Ron Allen that claims to be with your Presidential camp, who is alleged to claim that someone claiming to represent me called asking for $100,000, to keep me from coming forward about our (Obama and I) November 1999 encounter of sex and cocaine use?
2. How can the two of you stand in front of this country talking about bring people together at the same time you both have engaged your supporters in a massive internet smear against me where you are providing knowing false information to your paid bloggers for the purpose trying to keep the truth about you Mr. Obama from coming out?
3. How can you claim to be a uniter at the same time you are encouraging your supporters to threaten to blow my head off, to cut my throat and to set me on fire if I do not recent my statements?
4. How can either of you gentleman claim to be concerned about truth when you and Mr. Axelrod engaged in a payoff deal with Dan Parisi of Whitehouse.com to the tune of $750,000, to arrange a rigged polygraph?
5. Do you truly believe (that after you two have gone to the extent that you have to have me smeared on the internet with outright false statements) I will go away? Because if you do, I want to tell you right now that the only thing you have done by having my life repeatedly threatened, and by repeatedly providing out right false information for your supporters to post about me on the web, is to make certain that I will not go away and I will not rest until the truth about you both is across every headline around the world.
6. If you claim that neither of you have had nothing to do with the internet attacks and false statements, then prove, post it on your web site and denounce any such attacks. I know you will not because a great deal of the false information has come directly from Mr. Axelrod and his associates.
7. If you claim you had no involvement in the Whitehouse.com scam, then prove it. Publicly denounce Dan Parisi’s getting me to agree to his scam and then stopping payment on his check.
8. If you and Mr. Axelrod claim you had no involvement with Dan Parisi open up your accounts and the accounts of AKP and David Axelrod for review to prove it.
It needs to be made clear that I will not be threatened nor will I allow you to feed completely false information about me to your bloggers and then just fade away into the sunset. Let me make it clear that your attacks against me have only hardened my resolve to see that this story gets out and you are exposed for what both of you truly are.
Sincerely,
Larry Sinclair
Sunday, March 2, 2008
Saturday, March 1, 2008
Whitehouse.com check returned to Larry Sinclair
This check has been returned to Mr. Sinclair because Dan Parisi, the President of Whitehouse.com stopped payment on it. There has been a disagreement between both parties over the validity of the polygraph test taken last week. Mr. Sinclair wants to take a new test and Mr. Paris (pictured below) believes this is a breach of their "agreement".
Friday, February 29, 2008
Newest Larry Sinclair video
Larry sits down to update everyone on the latest in this Obama-Whitehouse.com scandal.
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Whitehouse.com stops payment to Larry Sinclair
UPDATE
I just received the follwing email. It seems that Whitehouse.com may be showing the Sinclair polygraph video for a fee.
Mr. Dan Parisi, President
WhiteHouse.com
RE: Rumored plan by you to air Polygraph Video
Mr. Parisi,
Will you confirm or deny the rumored plans by you and WhiteHouse.com to air the polygraph video that you obtained through fraud, on your web site this Friday, 2-29-08 for a fee to registered members of Whitehouse.com?
I would appreciate your confirming or denying this and should you fail to deny it I will then take that as the rumor being truthful and a continuation of your fraud.
Sincerely,
Larry Sinclair
I obtained this through an email from Mr. Sinclair;
Mr. Dan Parisi, President
WhiteHouse.com
295 Greenwich Street, Ste 184
New York, New York 10007-1049
RE: Returned Check
Dear Mr. Parisi,
Be advised that Lisa Brooks and Myself were notified by US Bank of Duluth this afternoon that Walden Federal (the bank in which Whitehouse.com Check Number 2046 is drawn on) has notified them a STOP PAYMENT was placed on your fee payment of $20,000.00 dated 2-21-08.
I have contacted the Financial Crimes Division of the Duluth Police Department this date concerning this matter. US Bank as informed Ms. Brooks and myself that the check has not yet been physically returned to them unpaid, but that if it is it will be returned to me by March 7, 2008.
I am asking that US Bank provide documentation showing Walden Federal has notified them the check is no good and I will begin the criminal complaint process against you and Whitehouse.com immediately upon receipt of the US Bank documentation.
Ms. Brooks and I will be charged for your dis-honored check and those charges will be included in the criminal complaint against you.
I have given you more than ample opportunity to honor your word and the agreement we had, especially seeing how you have received and engaged in using the very results of the services you paid for. You have chosen to act as if you are above the law and that sir will no doubt be you down fall.
Again, you can avoid this criminal action against you and your company by contacting your financial institution and instructing them to honor the check.
Sincerely,
Lawrence Sinclair
Whitehouse.com has removed all images of Mr. Sinclair from there site as of today.
I just received the follwing email. It seems that Whitehouse.com may be showing the Sinclair polygraph video for a fee.
Mr. Dan Parisi, President
WhiteHouse.com
RE: Rumored plan by you to air Polygraph Video
Mr. Parisi,
Will you confirm or deny the rumored plans by you and WhiteHouse.com to air the polygraph video that you obtained through fraud, on your web site this Friday, 2-29-08 for a fee to registered members of Whitehouse.com?
I would appreciate your confirming or denying this and should you fail to deny it I will then take that as the rumor being truthful and a continuation of your fraud.
Sincerely,
Larry Sinclair
I obtained this through an email from Mr. Sinclair;
Mr. Dan Parisi, President
WhiteHouse.com
295 Greenwich Street, Ste 184
New York, New York 10007-1049
RE: Returned Check
Dear Mr. Parisi,
Be advised that Lisa Brooks and Myself were notified by US Bank of Duluth this afternoon that Walden Federal (the bank in which Whitehouse.com Check Number 2046 is drawn on) has notified them a STOP PAYMENT was placed on your fee payment of $20,000.00 dated 2-21-08.
I have contacted the Financial Crimes Division of the Duluth Police Department this date concerning this matter. US Bank as informed Ms. Brooks and myself that the check has not yet been physically returned to them unpaid, but that if it is it will be returned to me by March 7, 2008.
I am asking that US Bank provide documentation showing Walden Federal has notified them the check is no good and I will begin the criminal complaint process against you and Whitehouse.com immediately upon receipt of the US Bank documentation.
Ms. Brooks and I will be charged for your dis-honored check and those charges will be included in the criminal complaint against you.
I have given you more than ample opportunity to honor your word and the agreement we had, especially seeing how you have received and engaged in using the very results of the services you paid for. You have chosen to act as if you are above the law and that sir will no doubt be you down fall.
Again, you can avoid this criminal action against you and your company by contacting your financial institution and instructing them to honor the check.
Sincerely,
Lawrence Sinclair
Whitehouse.com has removed all images of Mr. Sinclair from there site as of today.
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Info from Larry Sinclair about that night with Obama in Chicago
Taken from;
http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com/
Everyone wanting to make this go away says there is no evidence. Obama supporters have continue to claim I was in a mental institution, even posted one post (but took it down just as quick) that I was in Federal Prison (until the realized the middle name and birth dates were wrong), among many, many other outright false statements about me.
My Hotel reservation was made through Choice Hotels International central reservations originally for November 3, 1999 thru November 6, 1999. Confirmation number 78096854.
My stay was extended from November 6, 1999 through November 9, 1999 directly through the hotel which generated Confirmation number 86467. While I extended originally through Nov 9, 1999, I actually left on Nov 8, 1999.
The limo and bar charges are on Visa card issued by Associates National Bank of Wilmington, Delaware (which was bought out by CitiBank in 2000) monthly statement closing date of November 15, 1999. Card number 4621-2001-3393-5533. Which Citi Group has been contacted and is researching for those statements. Because I unlike most of you internet warriors insist on putting out only factual information.
So any of you who think you now that I do not have any receipts, witnesses etc….. THINK AGAIN
Respectfully,
Larry Sinclair
http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com/
Everyone wanting to make this go away says there is no evidence. Obama supporters have continue to claim I was in a mental institution, even posted one post (but took it down just as quick) that I was in Federal Prison (until the realized the middle name and birth dates were wrong), among many, many other outright false statements about me.
My Hotel reservation was made through Choice Hotels International central reservations originally for November 3, 1999 thru November 6, 1999. Confirmation number 78096854.
My stay was extended from November 6, 1999 through November 9, 1999 directly through the hotel which generated Confirmation number 86467. While I extended originally through Nov 9, 1999, I actually left on Nov 8, 1999.
The limo and bar charges are on Visa card issued by Associates National Bank of Wilmington, Delaware (which was bought out by CitiBank in 2000) monthly statement closing date of November 15, 1999. Card number 4621-2001-3393-5533. Which Citi Group has been contacted and is researching for those statements. Because I unlike most of you internet warriors insist on putting out only factual information.
So any of you who think you now that I do not have any receipts, witnesses etc….. THINK AGAIN
Respectfully,
Larry Sinclair
Larry Sinclair talks about polygraph tests
From http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com/
TEST REPORTS
I am posting this to explain what I was saying last night concerning the reports of Ed Gelb. After reviewing his report (for the first time actually) I noticed that Mr. Gelb stated
"The Polygrams were "blind scored" by another expert examiner who independently corroborrated the findings of the primary examiner"
This if true would make Mr. Gelb and Mr. Parisi liars when they stated to me that the results would be reveiewed by no one other than Gelb and Gordon. And if that in fact is the case, then Gelbs claim shows the results were set up from the beginning because Gordon Barland had not even received the exam charts, video, etc...until Saturday or Monday at the latest in his Office in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Furthermore, Mr. Gelb signed his report on 2-22-08 according to the documents and his office, yet Parisi as late as this past Monday stated they had the results but the results had not been typed. Another lie on the part of Parisi. Especially since Barlands report states he had received PDF files and reports in the materials to review prepared by Gelb.
While I understand there are so many of you that will not look at any of this because you have made it clear that you would support Obama even if he was a child molester and/or murderer. Both of which so many of you have tried to call me, but everything put out about me continues to be false.
Whitehouse.com has pulled back because they (Parisi and Braddock) know that the information provided to me regarding the $750,000 payment by Axelrod/Obama is true. The know that the communications between Parisi and Axelrod on Sunday that were accessed did take place and they spent all day Monday trying to figure out how I obtain the information. Parisi is trying to do to me what Axelrod did to him. He is trying to stop payment on the check issued for the photos and video taping of the Polygraph, because Axelrod has not paid the other $375,000 due under their $750,000 deal.
The only difference is I provided to Parisi exactly what he contracted for, and if his check is returned unpaid, Mr. Parisi will face arrest for Felony Check Fraud and Theft charges.
TEST REPORTS
I am posting this to explain what I was saying last night concerning the reports of Ed Gelb. After reviewing his report (for the first time actually) I noticed that Mr. Gelb stated
"The Polygrams were "blind scored" by another expert examiner who independently corroborrated the findings of the primary examiner"
This if true would make Mr. Gelb and Mr. Parisi liars when they stated to me that the results would be reveiewed by no one other than Gelb and Gordon. And if that in fact is the case, then Gelbs claim shows the results were set up from the beginning because Gordon Barland had not even received the exam charts, video, etc...until Saturday or Monday at the latest in his Office in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Furthermore, Mr. Gelb signed his report on 2-22-08 according to the documents and his office, yet Parisi as late as this past Monday stated they had the results but the results had not been typed. Another lie on the part of Parisi. Especially since Barlands report states he had received PDF files and reports in the materials to review prepared by Gelb.
While I understand there are so many of you that will not look at any of this because you have made it clear that you would support Obama even if he was a child molester and/or murderer. Both of which so many of you have tried to call me, but everything put out about me continues to be false.
Whitehouse.com has pulled back because they (Parisi and Braddock) know that the information provided to me regarding the $750,000 payment by Axelrod/Obama is true. The know that the communications between Parisi and Axelrod on Sunday that were accessed did take place and they spent all day Monday trying to figure out how I obtain the information. Parisi is trying to do to me what Axelrod did to him. He is trying to stop payment on the check issued for the photos and video taping of the Polygraph, because Axelrod has not paid the other $375,000 due under their $750,000 deal.
The only difference is I provided to Parisi exactly what he contracted for, and if his check is returned unpaid, Mr. Parisi will face arrest for Felony Check Fraud and Theft charges.
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
New Larry Sinclair Polygraph results raise even more questions.
Look at the forth page. It states, "I also evaluated the second series using the computer algorithum PolyScore (v. 6.0). It evaluated the chart as No Deception Indicated, and calculated the probability of deception as being less that .01 on a scale of .00 to 1.00.This was inconsistent with my numerical analysis."
Was this Whitehouse.com, which used to be a porn site trying to set Mr. Sinclair up? They made him sign a contract stating he wouldn't take another polygraph for four weeks. I think in four weeks Senator Obama will be the Democratic nominnee for President.
Larry added this on his site;
http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com
This is to explain my position on the Barland QC report.
Barland was smart enough to point out the data that was and was not provided to him for review. He was smart enough to point out the uncommon methods used and the lack of control over the situation by Mr. Gelb.
Yes, Barland still concurs with Gelb, which I had no doubt he would under the circumstances, but he was smart enough to protect himself by pointing out concerns.
I also want people to look at the actions of Whitehouse.com over the last 24 hours alone, something is truly not right here.
You do not just up and shut down your operation and revamp it in the manner that Parisi has done. What is there to hide.
Was it not Parisi who said "Put up or Shut up?"
Why would you stop payment on a check that you pay for services and you received those services and then you claim you are entitled to because you think a breach of contract may occur at some future time. Mr. Parisi breached our agreement as early as Friday afternoon 2-22-08. I have not submitted to another polygraph, I stated I wanted to do another one in full disclosure which was what Parisi said he was doing and then did not.
Thank you,
Larry Sinclair
Was this Whitehouse.com, which used to be a porn site trying to set Mr. Sinclair up? They made him sign a contract stating he wouldn't take another polygraph for four weeks. I think in four weeks Senator Obama will be the Democratic nominnee for President.
Larry added this on his site;
http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com
This is to explain my position on the Barland QC report.
Barland was smart enough to point out the data that was and was not provided to him for review. He was smart enough to point out the uncommon methods used and the lack of control over the situation by Mr. Gelb.
Yes, Barland still concurs with Gelb, which I had no doubt he would under the circumstances, but he was smart enough to protect himself by pointing out concerns.
I also want people to look at the actions of Whitehouse.com over the last 24 hours alone, something is truly not right here.
You do not just up and shut down your operation and revamp it in the manner that Parisi has done. What is there to hide.
Was it not Parisi who said "Put up or Shut up?"
Why would you stop payment on a check that you pay for services and you received those services and then you claim you are entitled to because you think a breach of contract may occur at some future time. Mr. Parisi breached our agreement as early as Friday afternoon 2-22-08. I have not submitted to another polygraph, I stated I wanted to do another one in full disclosure which was what Parisi said he was doing and then did not.
Thank you,
Larry Sinclair
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
VerveEarth
