The Way It Is...

Larry Sinclair arrested after Press Conference

2008-06-18T18:21:00.000-07:00

Accoring to Politico Mr. Sinclair was led away in hand cuffs after his press conference at the National Press Club. He evidently had a warrant for his arrest in Colorado. Mr. Sinclair held the press conference to raise awareness about his "night on the town" with Senator Obama back in 1999.

New Larry Sinclair video says he will not commit suicide

2008-05-13T16:39:00.000-07:00

Larry Sinclair accuses Obama of another homosexual affair

2008-05-01T16:54:00.001-07:00

In an open letter to Rev. Wright on his Wordpress page Larry Sinclair says the following;

May 1, 2008

Open Letter to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright: The Ship is Sailing

Dear Rev. Wright:

I am posting this open letter to you, to appeal to you, please DO WHAT JESUS WOULD DO, Tell the truth about Barack Obama.

You and I both know that you did counsel Barack Obama in the fall of 2007 on how to best address my request to him to come clean about his 1999 crack cocaine use.

You and I both know, that even though I never once mentioned the sexual encounters between Barack Obama and myself to his campaign, he did acknowledge said sexual encounters to you and your former Choir Director Donald Young.

You and I both know that Barack Obama and Donald Young had an intimate relationship with each other.

You know that Barack Obama knows who murdered or had Donald Young murdered! And you know why Donald Young was murdered.

Rev. Wright, you claim you are running for Jesus not for votes. So I appeal to you now, DO WHAT JESUS WOULD DO, come forward, be honest, and tell the truth! If you honestly had nothing to do with the planning, assisting, and executing of Mr. Young’s murder, then just come clean with what you know about Baracks involvement as his Pastor. DO WHAT JESUS WOULD DO, and give this man’s family closure and a sense of peace again.

Rev. Wright please allow Barack Obama to be required to answer for his lies, betrayal, and selling of his soul for the sole purpose of winning an election. Come forward about Barack’s confiding in you as to the truthfulness of my allegations against him.

I truly hope you will stop protecting this man; stop allowing this liar and his handlers to abuse, attack and slander those of us who speak the truth about him. Rev. Wright, you have the power to put all of this to rest once and for all by being honest and telling the American People, that Barack Obama admitted to you I am telling the truth about his drug use and sexual encounters with me in 1999.

DO WHAT JESUS WOULD DO!

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/

Wordpress disables Larry Sinclair's blog

2008-04-19T09:56:00.000-07:00

According to Mr. Sinclair's blog
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/
Wordpress is not going to allow him to post any new content on his blog. This is very suspicious considering the situation Mr. Sinclair is in. According to the terms of service on Wordpress Mr. Sinclair has done nothing wrong.
http://wordpress.com/tos/

I'm sure there's more to this.

Larry Sinclair to hold press conference

2008-04-17T13:49:00.001-07:00

I received the following email from Mr. Sinclair late last night. It seems he is going to out the limo driver and talk more about the whitehouse.com fiasco.

This is to let everyone know that I have asked Montgomery Sibley to schedule a Press Conference to disclose the Limo drivers ID and to disclose the source of the tip about the Axelrod/Parisi polygraph scam. I have told Sibley if he agrees I will do whatever it takes to get to DC for the PC.
Anyone here who has airline miles that will agree to help with transportation to/from DC let me know.

I am sick of these people getting away with lying and distorting the truth.

Let me know if you have any suggestions on getting to and from DC and hotel.

Thank you,

Larry Sinclair

Larry Sinclair discusses the warrant for his arrest in Florida

2008-04-14T13:35:00.001-07:00

As I am sure everyone is aware of the 1987 warrant out of Pasco County Florida that was disclosed by Mitch, which in a way I appreciate because I had no knowledge of it whatsoever.

I have spent the last hour on the phone with the Pasco County Sheriffs office Warrants Division 800-854-2862 x 6082, and the State Attorney’s Office in Dade City, Florida on this matter.

The Case number and warrant number is 87258CFAES. The warrant was issued on 1-30-87 and according to the State Attorney’s office is based on a check written to The Clerk of The Circuit Court in Dade City, Florida for $925.00.

I have offered to turn myself in to local authorities but have been told that I would have to turn myself in where the warrant was issued because they would not extradite. I have been told that this whole thing can be cleared up by one of three ways:

1. I can go to Dade City Florida, pay the $925.00 in person and take the receipt to the State Attorney’s office and the case dropped.

2. I can go to Pasco County Florida turn myself in and address it through the court process, or,

3. I can mail a Cashiers check or money order for $925.00 payable to Jed Pittman, Clerk of the Circuit Court, 38053 Live Oak Ave., Rm: 205, Dade City, Fl 33523 (WITH THE CASE NUMBER 87258CFAES written on the payment)with a copy of the payment mailed to the State Attorney’s office at the same address only instead of Rm 205 it would be Rm: 204, and the issue will be dismissed.

I am letting all of you know right now that I have informed the State Attorney’s Office I will try to get $925.00 to them as I do not have that kind of money but that it is the only way to clear this as I cannot afford to travel to Florida to handle this through a court case either.

I have informed the State Attorney that I did not have any business with the Pasco County Clerks office but it will cost a great deal more for me to travel to Pasco County, Dade City, FL to deal with this in court, or go to pay it in person.

Now for all those who say I have been running from this, next time get your facts correct please, before you start accusing me of things that are not true. This thing is 22 years old and it has not come up in any checks by Law Enforcement in the last 12 years alone.

Larry Sinclair offers proof he was in Chicago the night of his claims.

2008-03-28T14:13:00.000-07:00

Larry Sincalir proves that he was in Chicago the night he is claiming he was. I just received the following documents from Mr. Sinclair that proves he was indeed in Chicago that night.

More on the Obama campaign murder accusations

2008-03-28T02:59:00.000-07:00

I just received an email from Mr. Soinclair with this information. It may now be on his blog.

I was not living in Minnesota when I first contacted the Obama campaign about Obama’s meetings with me in 1999 for the purpose of taking cocaine and sex.
Between September 2007 and November, 2007 I left a total of four (4) different cell phone numbers with the office of the Obama campaign. This was necessary because I had to adjust the telephone number to correspond with each new location where I lived in that period. I have explained in my blog how I slowly made my way north to Minnesota before settling there.
I have never said that I met Donald Young in any face to face meeting. But I did have contact with him several times. Each time Mr. Young instigated the contact.
Nobody else, other than the Obama campaign, had a record of my constantly adjusted numbers. And I did not go public with my allegations until after Mr. Young was murdered.
So just how did Mr. Young know who I was? How did he know my cell phone number? (Please note that I have never said the exact number of times Mr. Young and I had contact. Nor have I stated the content of our exchanges. That and other information about the matter is reserved for the appropriate channels.I am providing this factual information to counteract the deliberate misinformation that a small army of internet warriors are spreading on the net in an attempt to distract attention from Obama’s past).

Larry Sinclair comes clean about his crimial record

2008-03-22T20:18:00.000-07:00

I just received the following email from Mr. Sinclair. Apparently he has had some people harassing him and he wanted to set the record straight.

I am sick of the emails and the threats to expose something that is not even there. I am post below my criminal background report from Colorado. I am removing my Social Security number and date of birth. I am also post a comment next to items that are in fact incorrect, and which have been misrepresented by others as being additional arrests when they in fact are not. Now, all of you who say I am not willing to or have not been truthful can find something else to take the focus off the actions of Barack Obama.
TO: SINCLAIR, LAWRENCE
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECORD INFORMATION YOU REQUESTED
FOR NAME: AVILA, LA-RYE DOB: SOC:
FOLLOWS:
ATTN: PUB
ATTENTION: SINCLAIR, LAWRENCE
COLORADO BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION - CRIME INFORMATION CENTER
690 KIPLING STREET, #3000, DENVER, COLORADO 80215 303/239-4208
NAME(S) USED: SINCLAIR, LARRY WAYNE
AVILA, LARYE VIZGUA This is nothing more than a mis-spelled entry of my Legal name at the time which was La-Rye Vizcrra Avila
AVILA, LARYE VIZCAUA Same as above
AVILAADAMS, LARYE VIZCAUA Again same as above and was entered using ADAMS because someone had reported my name to be La-Rye Vizcarra Avila Adams. (not because I ever went by that name)
GAHANAN, MOHAMMED FATHA This name in fact is from my Juvenile records while I was going to Cochise Community College in Douglas, AZ in the 1970’s when I had ran away and some of my Iranian friends had called me by this name and was reported to the Cochise County Sheriff’s Dept.
GAHANAN, MOHAMMED Same as above
SILVIS, LARYE ASHAITI My first legal name change was to La-Rye Ashaiti Silvas, this is in fact nothing more than a mis-spelled entry that anyone would know once it is entered whether mis spelled or not it is in the system
SINCLAIR, LARRI ASHAITI Entry date unknown but nothing more than entered using my birth name and legal name change
SILVAS, LARYE ASHAILI Again nothing more than mis-spelled.
ADAMS, LARYE VIZCARRA As stated above, someone reported me as being known by them incorrectly as Avila-Adams and this was entered without the - in Florida.
AVILA, LARYE VIZCARRA Correctly spelled LEGAL name at the time.
SINCLAIR, LAWRENCE XXXXX this is my original birth name which i have x’d my middle name out to protect my family from the Internet warriors.
SINCLAIR, LARI ASHAITI Again, simple mis-spelling and entry of birth name and Legal name change
PHYSICAL: W
DATE(S) OF BIRTH:
PLACE(S) OF BIRTH: IR This is example of incorrect information that people on the Internet post as fact. I was born in SC, not IR, whatever IR is.
SC
SCARS/MARKS: SC ABDOM
TAT ABDOM Incorrect, do not have nor have I ever had a tattoo on my stomach
TAT L ARM
TAT L SHLD I have a single tattoo of the name “TOMAS” with a small flower under it on my upper left arm. It is the only tattoo I have ever had in my life.
————————————————————————–
—-
CONTRIBUTOR / NAME / CHARGE /
ARREST# DATE DISPOSITION
————————————————————————–
—-
The below arrest is the issuing of checks without fund. I plead guilty and received 4 yrs probation.

PD DENVER SINCLAIR, LARCENY
ARREST # 306276 LARRY WAYNE OVER $200
DATE - 01/27/81 ITEM #001/006
Below is the charge which if anyone bother to actually check court records they would have found the charge was “Unauthorized Use of a Financial Transaction Device” the credit card number. Further more there was a second charge of second degree forgery which I plead guilty to even though court transcripts specifically show I advised the Judge I did not understand how I committed Forgery when I never signed any name other than my own. It was even later appealed to simply delete the conviction because I had plead guilty to a crime I in fact had not committed but was denied for filing after the time frames allowed by law, which was the attorneys doing, not mine. I was sentenced for both on 4-22-87 which are the last two entries.

PD LAKEWOOD SINCLAIR, FRAUD - ILLEG USE CREDIT CARDS
ARREST # 863673 LARRY WAYNE OFFENSE DATE: 11/17/86
DATE - 11/17/86 DISPO: HELD
ITEM #002/006

The below arrest was a warrant that had these people posting these mis-representations to fit there needs looked to the disposition would have found the charge dismissed.

PD LAKEWOOD SINCLAIR, FUGITIVE OTHER JURISDICTION
ARREST # 863673 LARRY WAYNE FOJ - SO PUEBLO - FRAUD BY CHECK
DATE - 11/17/86 OFFENSE DATE: 11/17/86
DISPO: HELD
ITEM #003/006
Again charge dismissed, but none of these people want you to know that every arrest while it will show, does not mean a conviction.

PD LAKEWOOD SINCLAIR, FUGITIVE OTHER JURISDICTION
ARREST # 863673 LARRY WAYNE FOJ-STATE PATROL-COLO SPRNGS-TRAF
DATE - 11/17/86 OFFENSE DATE: 11/17/86
DISPO: HELD
ITEM #004/006
These last two below that people are representing as additional arrests, failed to actually understand that the alleged arrest numbers are in fact the Courts commitment number from the sentence to the Colorado department of Corrections, and I was committed under the name of La-Rye Vizcarra Avila, but see the people who say they know this or that do not bother to correctly represent this to the public. DISPO is the disposition of the case, and it contrary to Mr. Tuckers claims that “Guilty at Trial” means I went to trial, I did not. I plead guilty to both charges without even asking for an attorney and the court transcript will show that. “Guilty at Trial” is the standard disposition term used regardless of if you plead guilty or went to trial and were found guilty.

TERRITORIAL CORRECT SINCLAIR, FORGERY
IONAL FACILITY - C LARRY WAYNE 2ND DEG
ARREST # 103056336 DATE - 04/22/87 DISPO: GUILTY AT TRIAL
16 YRS
ITEM #005/006
TERRITORIAL CORRECT SINCLAIR, FRAUD - ILLEG USE CREDIT CARDS
IONAL FACILITY - C LARRY WAYNE DISPO: GUILTY AT TRIAL
ARREST # 103056336 DATE - 04/22/87 16 YRS
ITEM #006/006
—- END OF RECORD MEETING DISSEMINATION CRITERIA —-
—— 03/22/08 —— 1940MT ——
*** CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES MAY NOT HAVE PROVIDED ALL ARRESTS, ***
*** CHARGES OR DISPOSITIONS TO THE CBI. THIS RECORD SHOWS ALL ***
*** ARRESTS, CHARGES & DISPOSITIONS THAT WERE PROVIDED, UNLESS ***
*** ACCESS TO THEM HAS BEEN LIMITED BY COURT ORDER. ***
*** FALSIFYING OR ALTERING THIS RECORD WITH THE INTENT TO ***
*** MISREPRESENT THE CONTENTS OF THE RECORD IS PROHIBITED BY ***
*** LAW, AND MAY BE PUNISHABLE AS A FELONY WHEN DONE WITH THE ***
*** INTENT TO INJURE OR DEFRAUD ANY PERSON. ***
Now, there I strongly suggest Mr. Hayes, Mr. Tucker, Craig, Mitch and anyone else who feels the need to claim that this is not correct, that you verify before you dare. Because I am sick to death of your malicious claims and mis-representations of official records. The Jefferson County District Courts records will confirm exactly as I have stated.

The Limo Driver found?

2008-03-21T18:52:00.000-07:00

Is this guy the limo driver that Mr. Sinclair is talking about? There are rumors all over the internet. Check out #104 on the link.

http://webapp.psc.state.md.us/Intranet/Transport/TaxicabDriver.cfm?var=M

Here's a link to a court case involving an Immigration Appeal case with a guy with the same name in Chicago.

http://altlaw.org/v1/cases/155367.txt

Larry Sinclair accuses the Obama camp of committing murder

2008-03-20T14:23:00.000-07:00

I just received the following email from Mr. Sinclair. In it he talks about not disclosing the limo driver's identity that would really benefit his claims. Towards the end of the letter he says that he believes that Obama's campaign was involved in a murder. Check it out below.

Who is the driver and alleged friend of Senator Barack Obama that drove for Five Star Limo service in Chicago 1999? Well I know, Senator Obama may actually remember, and my Attorney has been informed.

Yet, the bigger question here is why has the Obama supporters, web sites and bloggers steadily insisted on the drivers identity be disclosed on the Internet? If is not like any of the behavior, comments, and posts since my youtube video have exactly been open to objective, unbiased reporting or investigation now has it? I mean now some of these same Obama faithful who have threatened, call names, posted out right false statements, and even as recently as last night, in a comment to this blog no less, has claimed they will post pictures of me with them they say were taken the day I was with Barack Obama. Now if a person wants to claim in a comment they send me telling me how I hurt his wife’s feelings, that he has a photo of him and I taken they day I was in fact with Obama, my question is, what is your wife’s name, Dana McGreavey? I even told this person, who goes by the name “Mitch the Bitch”, which I think says it all, to post his claimed photo. He dared me to post his comment, which I did, but as I told him, he does not have the balls to try to post any such claimed photo. Just as he seems to think he can tell people about my life in Texas.

Again, I ask, why is it required to disclose the drivers name on the web? I believe it is so that the Obama supporters can continue to do what was recently reported on the cables news networks, which is to use the internet to stalk, harass, and intimidate anyone that they Google with that name or anything close to it. Last night it was reported that people have filed complaints against Obama bloggers and supporters for intentionally digging for non-Obama voters personal information, (names, addresses, phone numbers, employers) for the purpose of posting all over the web to encourage others to harass and attack. That is what has been done to me from day one.

So, to answer the question of why I will not disclose the driver this way, you Obama bloggers already answered it for me. Now that I have been pushed to address this in the Courts, I will continue to move forward in that process and the identity of the driver will be disclosed within the process of the Courts. No claims by nameless individuals claiming there is no such person, or claims as came from Mitch the Bitch, or anyone else will change the manner in which this information comes out.
I personally do believe that Senator Obama’s campaign was indeed involved in one murder, and I am not going to be the second in an attempt to avoid being held accountable for HIS action. I know this statement will receive a number of comments claiming I am crazy, but what I think is crazy is how many of you say things and defend Obama when you have no personal knowledge of anything yourself.

So, does Obama camp want driver disclosed on the web for the purpose of shutting him up before he speaks? Does Obama camp want driver disclosed on the web to shut both of us up before he speaks. Barack Obama wants to be President of the United States so much he will say his own grandmother is a racist, in order to defend his actions. So no, I do not believe Obama or his advisers Axelrod or Plouffe o anyone else close to him are above anything to keep this or any other information about him from coming out that can keep him out of the White House.

Harlem Pastor James David Manning tears into Obama

2008-03-19T18:52:00.001-07:00

This is very entertaining if nothing else.

Black church turns on Obama

2008-03-19T18:52:00.000-07:00

This is very entertaining if nothing else.

Howard Dean reaches out to Larry Sinclair for help

2008-03-17T17:30:00.000-07:00

I didn't know things were this bad for the Democrats but...

Mr. Sinclair recently posted this on his blog
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com

Dear Larry,

A year ago, no one would have guessed our party’s primary season would still be going this strong. But that’s not the only surprise of this election season.

Democrats are voting in larger numbers than anyone expected, and this record turnout shows incredible promise for the general election ahead of us.

But we also have a problem. John McCain has already sewn up the Republican nomination, and he’s free to raise money and campaign all across the country.

The past few days, he’s taken his campaign on a world tour at taxpayer expense. This weekend, he made a “surprise” stop in Iraq, trying to re-frame five years of steadfast support for George Bush’s war with photo ops and press releases.

We can’t afford to wait for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to win the Democratic nomination — they’re focused on winning the nomination while John McCain is focused on winning the White House. We are the only organization that can look beyond the primaries and lay the groundwork for Hillary or Barack to inherit if they win. They can’t run against John McCain yet, but we can do it for them.

I need you to make a donation now so that we can continue our campaign against John McCain. Hillary or Barack will need the infrastructure in place as soon as they’re nominated:

Larry Sinclair has a brain tumor

2008-03-08T06:29:00.000-08:00

There has been speculation about Mr. Sinclair's heath. Some had said he was mentally, some had said he was dying. Mr. Sinclair is now confirming he has a brain tumor and is in a great amount of pain.

Mr. Sinclair just published this on his site;
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/

It had been my intent and desire to not bring my health into this story because it has no bearing on the FACTS. However, several Youtube claims along with Globe Magazines claims that I am mentally ill and that my health is playing a part in this story have made it necessary for me to set the record straight.

Yes, I have been diagnosed with a Brain Tumor. NO, I am not on my death bed. In fact I never stated to the Globe or anyone else that I had less than a year to live. The funny thing about all these claims of my impending demise is that no one can make such a claim, not even me. The reason being is simple, when I was diagnosed I made the decision not to treat and to allow nature to take its course. I believe we all are going to die, and when it is our time there is nothing any of us or any Dr. can do. So my decision was mine and I have not allowed any Dr. to tell me what they believe is my expiration date.

I suffer from severe nerve damage in the hands, arms, legs and spine. My right leg is numb all the time and there are times when I cannot move either of my legs. In addition to this my C-T-L spine has severe disc herniation. I have Fibromyalgia, asthma, severe allergies, heart problems, bleeding ulcers and I eat maybe once every two or three days.

I maintain body weight by drinking an average of 36 Pepsi’s per day.

The repeated claims of mental illness are nothing more than attempts by the Obama camp and his supporters to take the focus off of the issue of his drug use and dismiss them as coming from a nut case. I have repeated asked anyone posting such claims of mental illness and/or stays in mental institutions to gives names of said institutions and dates of my stays which they have not and cannot do. Why you ask? Because the claims are outright false.

Let us all remember that it was and is Barack Obama who says he wants a new kind of politics, a politics of openness and accountability. Only it appears he wants a politics of accountability as long as he is not the one being held accountable.

I submit to all of you that the attacks against me based on my past are attempts by the Obama camp to take the focus off the issue as I AM THE ONE WHO DISCLOSED THE FACTS OF MY PAST, and I find it more of the Obama double standard. Why? Because everyone is saying what Obama did in 1999 is not important today, maybe he changed his ways. Yet my past dates back to the 1980’s but I am portrayed as what I did in my 20’s.

Obama and his supporters cannot have it both ways. Lets be honest and imply face the truth and admit your encounters with me in 1999 and move on. But as one Youtube email stated bluntly, “if you think Obama, a candidate for President of the U.S. is ever going to admit to this you truly are crazy.”

So even the Obama supporters have made it clear that the truth is not important, the only hing that is important is to continue to spread false statements about me so the public thinks this is nothing more than a smear so Obama can avoid having to face the truth.

For all of our best interests I hope that there are citizens out there that refuse to allow this to be swept under the rug.

Larry Sinclair asks Obama to release 1999 cell phone records

2008-03-07T18:34:00.000-08:00

According to Mr. Sinclair's blog;
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/
I have prepared a written request which will be sent FedEx to the Obama offices requesting Senator Obama agree to release his cell phone records from 1999. Needless to say I am not holding my breath for a response, much less for him to agree to release those records. But the fact is if he, as his fanatical supporters continue to insist in their smear attacks, is not hiding from the truth, then he should have no problem agreeing to release those records.

Since it seems that the new thing is for people to post videos and comments on the pro obama web directing individuals to continue to send threatening text messages and phone calls to me, I want to remind those individuals that such activity is classified as a felony on both the State and Federal level, and I will report each one to Law Enforcement as I did with Troy’s (youtube user kos6834) from the Portland, Maine area. Furthermore I will be adding a section here on the blog for posting all phone numbers in-which calls and text messages come from.

The latest from Larry Sinclair

2008-03-07T12:46:00.000-08:00

Mr. Sinclair now has his own blog that he updates from time to time;
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com

This is his latest post.

I have been reading lately on how I am supposed to be fading into the sunset. I have been somewhat busy the past week sifting through the mountain of comments, web posts, emails, and the recorded threats from my voice mail that I truly have not had time to post any update.
The purpose for having to sort through this stuff is simple, my Attorney and I are preparing complaints that WILL be filed in the US Courts in Washington, DC. These suits, unlike my previous one, will clearly state the claims against Senator Obama, his staff and his camp, supported by the necessary evidence to go forward. In addition we (counsel and I) have been extremely busy in documenting the numerous Internet posts which were completely false and were posted for the sole purpose of trying to slander and libel me, and to keep the attention off of the real issue, Barack Obama’s drug use.
I find it interesting how easy it has been now to trace these things back to the owners of the sites and the emails they originated from. It has also taught me that while people can think they are protected by free speech when putting out such malicious lies, it is nice to know they ARE NOT and they can be held liable.
People, Barack Obama may have done what a great many of us done in life, he may have changed, he may not use cocaine today, BUT because he is running for the highest office in this Country, HE MUST ANSWER TO WHY HE WAS USING IN 1999 AND LYING ABOUT IT. HE MUST CONVIENCE THE VOTERS THAT HE IS NOT STILL USING AND TO SIMPLY SAY, Oh I don’t need to respond to that CANNOT BE ALLOWED IF HE WANTS YOUR VOTE.

Links to Larry Sinclair's recent radio interviews

2008-03-03T15:23:00.000-08:00

From Mr. Sinclair's MSN page;
http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com

The following links will take you to Radio interviews. I am still working on the link to Mike Herzog of Republic Broadcasting.

http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_L_Sinclair_022608.mp3

http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_Larry_Sinclair_012308.mp3

http://trp.fileburst.com/TRP_2008.02.08-du.mp3

http://www.jimsumptershow.com/multimedia/archives/Jim%20Sumpter%20Show%20-%20Monday%2002-18-08%20-%20Hour%201.mp3

http://a1135.g.akamai.net/f/1135/18227/1h/cchannel.download.akamai.com/18227/podcast/MINNEAPOLIS-MN/KTLK-FM/BAKER021808_9A.mp3?CPROG=PCAST&MARKET=MINNEAPOLIS-MN&NG_FORMAT=talk&SITE_ID=3359&STATION_ID=KTLK-FM&PCAST_AUTHOR=100.3_K-TALK&PCAST_CAT=talk&PCAST_TITLE=Chris_Baker_Podcast_on_K-TALK

The following link is to Bill Cunningham Sunday night last week

http://a1135.g.akamai.net/f/1135/18227/1h/cchannel.download.akamai.com/18227/podcast/CINCINNATI-OH/WLW-AM/WILLIE0222HR3.mp3?CPROG=PCAST&MARKET=CINCINNATI-OH&NG_FORMAT=newstalk&SITE_ID=1209&STATION_ID=WLW-AM&PCAST_AUTHOR=700WLW&PCAST_CAT=Talk_Radio&PCAST_TITLE=Bill_Cunningham_On_Demand

Returned check notice to Dan Parisi from Larry Sinclair

2008-03-03T03:26:00.000-08:00

March 3, 2008

Dan Parisi
WhiteHouse.com, Inc.
295 Greenwich Street, Ste. 184
New York, NY 10007-1049

RE: RETURN CHECK NOTICE PURSUANT TO SECTION 332.50 AND 609.535 OF MINNESOTA STATUTES 1997.

Dear Mr. Parisi and WhiteHouse.com, Inc.

The following is a DEMAND FOR PAYMENT on WhiteHouse.com, Inc. Check number 2046, drawn on Walden Federal of Monroe, NY which was issued on February 22, 2008 to Lawrence Sinclair by Mr. Dan Parisi, President of WhiteHouse.com, Inc.

This check was issued for payment of “fee” as clearly stated on the memo line of said check, and is a legal debt owed by Whitehouse.com, Inc. and Dan Parisi for services received by way of video taping of polygraph exam and receiving said exam results and reports which were released to Whitehouse.com, Inc. and Dan Parisi specifically for the payment in the amount of Twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) that was made by bad check.

Pursuant to sections 332.50 and 609.535 of Minnesota Statutes 1997, you are hereby notified that immediate payment of your dishonored check in the sum of Twenty Thousand dollars ($20,000.00) plus Nineteen dollars ($19.00) returned check fee charged by US Bank is demanded.

Total payment for Twenty Thousand nineteen dollars ($20,019.00) must be received within five (5) days from the date of this notice. Funds must be received in the form of CERTIFIED CHECK, no personal or company checks will be accepted for payment of the dishonored check.

Failure to make payment in full within the five (5) days will result in the filing of criminal charges on this check. In addition, a copy of the civil penalties under Minnesota Statutes makes you liable for the original amount of the dishonored check in addition to an additional amount equal to the amount of the original check if not paid within thirty (30) days of the date of this notice.

It is requested that you make payment on this dishonored check without delay to avoid additional civil and criminal penalties under Minnesota State Law.

Sincerely,

Lawrence Sinclair

Enclosures: Photo copy of Returned Check dated 2-28-08
Notice of civil penalties per Minnesota Statutes 332.50 & 609.535

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I Lawrence Sinclair hereby certify that I did deposit in the U.S. Postal Service, Priority Mail Delivery Confirmation Requested, Postage pre-paid the forgoing RETURN CHECK NOTICE along with copy of Notice of Penalties pursuant of sections 332.50 and 609.535 of Minnesota Statutes 1997, and photo copy of the Returned check from US Bank of Duluth, Minnesota, this 3rd day of March, 2008 at the Snyder's U.S. Postal Service contract sub-station in the Holiday Center in Duluth, MN.

Dated March 3, 2008 Lawrence Sinclair

Letter from Larry Sinclair to the Obama campaign

2008-03-02T05:03:00.001-08:00

According to Mr. Sinclair's MSN page;
http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com/

The following letter has been written to the Obama campaign and is being mailed on Monday. He is basically calling them out on the allegations that they paid off Whitehouse.com and asks them to disclose financial records to prove it.

March 2, 2008

Senator Barack Obama
713 Hart Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

Senator Barack Obama

230 S. Dearborn Street, Ste. 3900

Chicago, IL 60604

Mr. David Axelrod

AKP Message & Media

730 N. Franklin Street, Ste. 404

Chicago, IL 60610

RE: Questions

Dear Senator Obama and Mr. Axelrod:

I am writing the two of you this letter because phone calls continue to be ignored. I feel it is only fair that I address the following questions to the two of you directly one last time.

1. Who is Ron Allen that claims to be with your Presidential camp, who is alleged to claim that someone claiming to represent me called asking for $100,000, to keep me from coming forward about our (Obama and I) November 1999 encounter of sex and cocaine use?

2. How can the two of you stand in front of this country talking about bring people together at the same time you both have engaged your supporters in a massive internet smear against me where you are providing knowing false information to your paid bloggers for the purpose trying to keep the truth about you Mr. Obama from coming out?

3. How can you claim to be a uniter at the same time you are encouraging your supporters to threaten to blow my head off, to cut my throat and to set me on fire if I do not recent my statements?

4. How can either of you gentleman claim to be concerned about truth when you and Mr. Axelrod engaged in a payoff deal with Dan Parisi of Whitehouse.com to the tune of $750,000, to arrange a rigged polygraph?

5. Do you truly believe (that after you two have gone to the extent that you have to have me smeared on the internet with outright false statements) I will go away? Because if you do, I want to tell you right now that the only thing you have done by having my life repeatedly threatened, and by repeatedly providing out right false information for your supporters to post about me on the web, is to make certain that I will not go away and I will not rest until the truth about you both is across every headline around the world.

6. If you claim that neither of you have had nothing to do with the internet attacks and false statements, then prove, post it on your web site and denounce any such attacks. I know you will not because a great deal of the false information has come directly from Mr. Axelrod and his associates.

7. If you claim you had no involvement in the Whitehouse.com scam, then prove it. Publicly denounce Dan Parisi’s getting me to agree to his scam and then stopping payment on his check.

8. If you and Mr. Axelrod claim you had no involvement with Dan Parisi open up your accounts and the accounts of AKP and David Axelrod for review to prove it.

It needs to be made clear that I will not be threatened nor will I allow you to feed completely false information about me to your bloggers and then just fade away into the sunset. Let me make it clear that your attacks against me have only hardened my resolve to see that this story gets out and you are exposed for what both of you truly are.

Sincerely,

Larry Sinclair

Whitehouse.com check returned to Larry Sinclair

2008-03-01T16:19:00.000-08:00

This check has been returned to Mr. Sinclair because Dan Parisi, the President of Whitehouse.com stopped payment on it. There has been a disagreement between both parties over the validity of the polygraph test taken last week. Mr. Sinclair wants to take a new test and Mr. Paris (pictured below) believes this is a breach of their "agreement".

Newest Larry Sinclair video

2008-02-29T03:07:00.000-08:00

Larry sits down to update everyone on the latest in this Obama-Whitehouse.com scandal.

Whitehouse.com stops payment to Larry Sinclair

2008-02-28T13:19:00.000-08:00

UPDATE
I just received the follwing email. It seems that Whitehouse.com may be showing the Sinclair polygraph video for a fee.

Mr. Dan Parisi, President
WhiteHouse.com

RE: Rumored plan by you to air Polygraph Video

Mr. Parisi,

Will you confirm or deny the rumored plans by you and WhiteHouse.com to air the polygraph video that you obtained through fraud, on your web site this Friday, 2-29-08 for a fee to registered members of Whitehouse.com?

I would appreciate your confirming or denying this and should you fail to deny it I will then take that as the rumor being truthful and a continuation of your fraud.

Sincerely,

Larry Sinclair

I obtained this through an email from Mr. Sinclair;

Mr. Dan Parisi, President
WhiteHouse.com
295 Greenwich Street, Ste 184
New York, New York 10007-1049

RE: Returned Check

Dear Mr. Parisi,

Be advised that Lisa Brooks and Myself were notified by US Bank of Duluth this afternoon that Walden Federal (the bank in which Whitehouse.com Check Number 2046 is drawn on) has notified them a STOP PAYMENT was placed on your fee payment of $20,000.00 dated 2-21-08.

I have contacted the Financial Crimes Division of the Duluth Police Department this date concerning this matter. US Bank as informed Ms. Brooks and myself that the check has not yet been physically returned to them unpaid, but that if it is it will be returned to me by March 7, 2008.

I am asking that US Bank provide documentation showing Walden Federal has notified them the check is no good and I will begin the criminal complaint process against you and Whitehouse.com immediately upon receipt of the US Bank documentation.

Ms. Brooks and I will be charged for your dis-honored check and those charges will be included in the criminal complaint against you.

I have given you more than ample opportunity to honor your word and the agreement we had, especially seeing how you have received and engaged in using the very results of the services you paid for. You have chosen to act as if you are above the law and that sir will no doubt be you down fall.

Again, you can avoid this criminal action against you and your company by contacting your financial institution and instructing them to honor the check.

Sincerely,

Lawrence Sinclair

Whitehouse.com has removed all images of Mr. Sinclair from there site as of today.

Info from Larry Sinclair about that night with Obama in Chicago

2008-02-27T15:19:00.000-08:00

Taken from;

http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com/

Everyone wanting to make this go away says there is no evidence. Obama supporters have continue to claim I was in a mental institution, even posted one post (but took it down just as quick) that I was in Federal Prison (until the realized the middle name and birth dates were wrong), among many, many other outright false statements about me.

My Hotel reservation was made through Choice Hotels International central reservations originally for November 3, 1999 thru November 6, 1999. Confirmation number 78096854.

My stay was extended from November 6, 1999 through November 9, 1999 directly through the hotel which generated Confirmation number 86467. While I extended originally through Nov 9, 1999, I actually left on Nov 8, 1999.

The limo and bar charges are on Visa card issued by Associates National Bank of Wilmington, Delaware (which was bought out by CitiBank in 2000) monthly statement closing date of November 15, 1999. Card number 4621-2001-3393-5533. Which Citi Group has been contacted and is researching for those statements. Because I unlike most of you internet warriors insist on putting out only factual information.

So any of you who think you now that I do not have any receipts, witnesses etc….. THINK AGAIN

Respectfully,

Larry Sinclair

Larry Sinclair talks about polygraph tests

2008-02-27T14:12:00.000-08:00

From http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com/

TEST REPORTS

I am posting this to explain what I was saying last night concerning the reports of Ed Gelb. After reviewing his report (for the first time actually) I noticed that Mr. Gelb stated

"The Polygrams were "blind scored" by another expert examiner who independently corroborrated the findings of the primary examiner"

This if true would make Mr. Gelb and Mr. Parisi liars when they stated to me that the results would be reveiewed by no one other than Gelb and Gordon. And if that in fact is the case, then Gelbs claim shows the results were set up from the beginning because Gordon Barland had not even received the exam charts, video, etc...until Saturday or Monday at the latest in his Office in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Furthermore, Mr. Gelb signed his report on 2-22-08 according to the documents and his office, yet Parisi as late as this past Monday stated they had the results but the results had not been typed. Another lie on the part of Parisi. Especially since Barlands report states he had received PDF files and reports in the materials to review prepared by Gelb.

While I understand there are so many of you that will not look at any of this because you have made it clear that you would support Obama even if he was a child molester and/or murderer. Both of which so many of you have tried to call me, but everything put out about me continues to be false.

Whitehouse.com has pulled back because they (Parisi and Braddock) know that the information provided to me regarding the $750,000 payment by Axelrod/Obama is true. The know that the communications between Parisi and Axelrod on Sunday that were accessed did take place and they spent all day Monday trying to figure out how I obtain the information. Parisi is trying to do to me what Axelrod did to him. He is trying to stop payment on the check issued for the photos and video taping of the Polygraph, because Axelrod has not paid the other $375,000 due under their $750,000 deal.

The only difference is I provided to Parisi exactly what he contracted for, and if his check is returned unpaid, Mr. Parisi will face arrest for Felony Check Fraud and Theft charges.

New Larry Sinclair Polygraph results raise even more questions.

2008-02-26T21:10:00.000-08:00

Look at the forth page. It states, "I also evaluated the second series using the computer algorithum PolyScore (v. 6.0). It evaluated the chart as No Deception Indicated, and calculated the probability of deception as being less that .01 on a scale of .00 to 1.00.This was inconsistent with my numerical analysis."

Was this Whitehouse.com, which used to be a porn site trying to set Mr. Sinclair up? They made him sign a contract stating he wouldn't take another polygraph for four weeks. I think in four weeks Senator Obama will be the Democratic nominnee for President.

Larry added this on his site;
http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com

This is to explain my position on the Barland QC report.

Barland was smart enough to point out the data that was and was not provided to him for review. He was smart enough to point out the uncommon methods used and the lack of control over the situation by Mr. Gelb.

Yes, Barland still concurs with Gelb, which I had no doubt he would under the circumstances, but he was smart enough to protect himself by pointing out concerns.

I also want people to look at the actions of Whitehouse.com over the last 24 hours alone, something is truly not right here.

You do not just up and shut down your operation and revamp it in the manner that Parisi has done. What is there to hide.

Was it not Parisi who said "Put up or Shut up?"

Why would you stop payment on a check that you pay for services and you received those services and then you claim you are entitled to because you think a breach of contract may occur at some future time. Mr. Parisi breached our agreement as early as Friday afternoon 2-22-08. I have not submitted to another polygraph, I stated I wanted to do another one in full disclosure which was what Parisi said he was doing and then did not.

Thank you,

Larry Sinclair

More email to/from Larry Sinclair and Mr. Parisi from Whitehouse.com just released

2008-02-26T12:55:00.000-08:00

From:
The latest WH emails on Expert Reports and intent to commit check fraud

Lawrence Sinclair (lws)

Sent: Tue 2/26/08 3:01 PM
To: Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)
Cc: Rob Capriccioso (rob@bigheaddc.com)

I believe your refusal to post it will only allow others to believe you are in bed with Axelrod, you have already posted the photos, the drug test and Gelbs report so you not posting this one isn't going to stop you from legally owing me the funds you are now refusing to pay or from criminal charges for check fraud.

Thanks,

Larry Sinclair

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: No Polygraph
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:55:17 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

We will not post the report. You will have it in about 30 minutes. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.

You have just stated that you are not paying for the rights so why are you reporting or posting any such claim?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: No Polygraph
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:47:14 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

We just received the written results form Dr. Gordon Barland. As soon as we scan it we will forward copy to you. He concurred with Dr. Gelb. The last sentence reads as follows:

“Based upon my review of this examination, I concur in Mr. Gelb’s finding that Mr. Sinclair was not telling the complete truth in his claims to have engaged in oral sex with Senator Obama and that Senator Obama used cocaine in his presence. “

Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lawrence Sinclair [mailto:lws]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:39 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Cc:
Subject: RE: No Polygraph

No I have not, but have you seen any such polygraph test been done? Sir you can do what you want, you cannot say I have breached any agreement until I have actually done it. If you think that my expressing my desire to have a polygraph done in full disclosure constitutes a breech, then you go right ahead and refuse to honor your check, because in MN giving a bad check is a Felony and it is not excused by the maker claiming breech of contract. Presneting a check for services and not honoring that check is a CRIMINAL ACT and the maker of the check is civilly liable for three (3) times the amount of the check.

You either honor the check issued as payment for fee's or you face Felony check charges, I personally do not care. But you will not exploit my mothers situation and then make her physically ill because she see'e you stating you have stopped payment of the check based on a 'perceived' future breech.

Thank you

Larry Sinclair

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: RE: No Polygraph
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:29:58 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

Did you forget about this email you sent on 2/21 which I just took off your live.com page.

RE: Dear murray‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair (lws)

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 9:35 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

If you want to do this without doing the 100K yes, Because even the part coming to me is going to pay my mothers back bills and medication so yes, if that is acceptable to you. You still have all exclusive rights to video as you want, and I still agree that no other polygraphs can be done for 4 weeks.
Dan Parisi
President
WhiteHouse.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lawrence Sinclair [mailto:lws
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:21 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: No Polygraph

No polygraph has been done and You changed the terms of the agreement on your own on 2-21-08 so your refusing to honor your payment sheds light on your intent.

You have no grounds to stop payment on what you think might happen when it has not happened.

If you decide that you are going to stop payment on the check that clearly states it is for 'fee' charged, then understand that by MN State law, I will be entitled to 3 times the amount of the original check.

Also, You posted my photographs which were acquired by and for the check for $20,000.00 as was the video tape and exam. Therefore, I am advising you that failure to honor your check will result in 'theft by Check' over $100,000 which is what could be made for the photos and video tape you acquired by fraud.

You can be a man and honor your agreement set forth by you on 2-21-08 and go about your business, or you can proceed with this fraud and deal with both civil and criminal actions against you and your company.

It is your choice.

WhiteHouse.com will not release video footage or final report of Mr. Sinclair's polygraph

2008-02-26T12:21:00.000-08:00

According to WhiteHouse.com

"After the events of yesterday and this morning we will no longer be posting the video of the Polygraph testing or the secondary Polygrapher Expert’s results. To be accused of taking a bribe to suppress this story along with all of the hate mail and messages sent by Larry Sinclair supporters who believe we did something to taint the results has been very disturbing.

No matter what we put up it will never be good enough for his supporters. Mr. Sinclair was also given every opportunity to let us talk to the limousine driver to corroborate his story and he failed to do so. This will be the last post on this matter as this matter needs to be put to bed. We will be going back to regular reporting."

What are they hiding? They said they would disclose everything and they clearly haven't. We learned they are canceling the checks issued to Mr. Sinclair and earlier today I reported about how they used to be a porn site.

UPDATE

From:
The latest WH emails on Expert Reports and intent to commit check fraud

Lawrence Sinclair (lws)

Sent: Tue 2/26/08 3:01 PM
To: Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)
Cc: Rob Capriccioso (rob@bigheaddc.com)

I believe your refusal to post it will only allow others to believe you are in bed with Axelrod, you have already posted the photos, the drug test and Gelbs report so you not posting this one isn't going to stop you from legally owing me the funds you are now refusing to pay or from criminal charges for check fraud.

Thanks,

Larry Sinclair

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: No Polygraph
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:55:17 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

We will not post the report. You will have it in about 30 minutes. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.

WhiteHouse.com was a porn site until 2004

2008-02-26T11:34:00.000-08:00

WhiteHouse.com was a porn site until 2004. Mr. Parisi used the name WhiteHouse.com to lure unsuspecting visitors into a porn site. It got so bad that in 1997 he was sent a letter from the real White House.

The White House
Washington

December 8, 1997

Mr. Dan Parisi
Secaucus, New Jersey

Dear Mr. Parisi:

It will come as no surprise to you that the White House Counsel's Office is aware of your Internet Web site, "www.whitehouse.com," and that we object to your use of the names and images of the White House, the President, and the First Lady on that Web site to sell memberships in an adult video club. We also recognize that you undoubtedly will use this letter as an object of humor and as an invitation to advance the claim that you are merely exercising your rights under the First Amendment.

We too believe in the First Amendment--and in humor, although we see nothing humorous in your use of the White House domain name to draw children and other unwitting Internet users to your Web site. However distasteful your business may be, we do not challenge your right to pursue it or to exercise your First Amendment rights, but we do challenge your right to use the White House, the President, and the First Lady as a marketing device. For adult internet users, that device is, at the least, part of a deceptive scheme. For younger Internet users, it has more disturbing consequences. As your own online disclaimer implicitly acknowledges, the foreseeable result of your use of the White House domain name is that children will access your Web site inadvertently. Your customers will understand that such a result is unconscionable, and so, we submit, should you.

Sincerely,

Charles F.C. Ruff
Counsel to the President
http://www.news.com/2009-1023-207800.html?legacy=cnet

According to archived CNN.com artlcle;
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/02/10/whitehouse.com.ap/

Mr. Parisi the owner decided to make a change with the site when his son started kindergarten in 2004. He initally decided to sell it then changed his mind and kept it with a different theme. In November 2005 it became a real estate site. In March 2006 it became a "Free Speech Forum". July 2006 saw it go back to a real estate site. Novemeber 2006 it became a search engine for people. Only in June of 2007 did they start covering politics. It even says on the "About Us" section (pictured below)that "We are rebranding and relaunching as a Political/News/ Entertainment site in January 2008."

Now this same man and site is coming under fire for not being forthright with the way they handled Larry Sinclair. They offered him a challenge to take a polygraph and release all the findings on the site. They did release some of the "findings" but not after stringing everyone along for a few days. Mr. Sinclair claims that Dr. Gelb, who isn't even a doctor walked away from him several times and talked to Mr. Parisi in private. Mr. Sinclair was kept out of the loop for days and now there are allegations that Mr. Parisi took money from Senator Obama's campaign to get the desired results.

WhiteHouse.com cancels checks issued to Larry Sinclair because he is taking a new polygraph today

2008-02-26T10:42:00.001-08:00

This is an email that was just sent to me from Mr. Sinclair;

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE BELOW PASTED EMAIL FROM DAN PARISI MAKES IT CLEAR THIS MAN IS A FRAUD, HE HAS NOTIFIED ME THAT HIS CHECK WILL NOT BE HONORED. I HAVE ADVISED HIM THAT I WILL FILE A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAISNT HIM IF THIS CHECK IS RETURNED UNPAID.

From: Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)
Sent: Tue 2/26/08 12:05 PM
To: Lawrence Sinclair (lws)

I saw this interview this morning and posted your response in regards to another polygraph test. It shows that you are doing another polygraph with results in this afternoon in violation of our agreement. I have instructed bank to stop payment on the $20,000 check this morning. The $10,000 in checks going to the charities are not effected and will be paid.
LS: I will continue to put my story out there. I am getting some assistance in amending the lawsuit for refiling, and please note, it has not yet been dismissed, nor has the recommendation to dismiss been received or written as claimed by the judge identified on the Web. I am not going away, I am not recanting anything, and I am fighting on, especially with the tip I received this date. I will do a polygraph arranged by me, video tape it non-edited and with the findings released before stopping the camera and will post it before Tuesday if all goes well.

Dan Parisi
President

Interview with Larry Sinclair

2008-02-26T03:25:00.000-08:00

This is an interview Larry did with a website called Bighead DC yesterday

Big Head DC: Do you think that Dan Parisi or anyone else who works for WhiteHouse.com is or has been employed by David Axelrod and/or other members of Sen. Obama’s campaign for president?

Larry Sinclair: I believe Dan Parisi and Robert Braddock were acting as agents of David Axelrod and the Obama camp in making the offer for me to take the polygraph. I believe this to be true as I received a tip via phone at 12:43 a.m. instructing me to find help in obtaining financial records from the Obama camp and Axelrod because an account and communications were accessed in which WH.com and Parisi were having a dispute with Axelrod over the payment of the remaining part of $750,000 to get a polygraph stating I was lying posted fast enough.

BHDC: What do you make of the “deception” finding from WhiteHouse.com’s polygraph conducted by Ed Gelb?

LS: I honestly believe that these results and the claims by Gelb are false, I believe he knowingly accepted money to provide WH.com with the desired results. This is based on the request upon arrival by Gelb’s office for payment of an additional amount that I personally heard a receptionist tell Parisi that Gelb said there was an extra charge and Parisi acknowledged he was advised. I believe this based on all the whispering done while I was present and the amount of time the three spent in closed door discussions before, during and after the exam.

BHDC: There have been several claims that Gelb is not a real PhD — did he present himself as one to you? Did he seem professional?

LS: Gelb did in fact represent himself to me as having a PhD that I found out after returning home was in fact not the case. He did appear somewhat professional with a constant shaking, however he did not control anything about the process and in fact was taking his direction from Robert Braddock of WH.com and Dan Parisi.

BHDC: How did Parisi act toward you throughout the polygraph process?

LS: Parisi did not even look me in the face from the time I met him that Friday morning through the entire visit. He continued to look down toward the floor every time I spoke to him or he was in my presence. He did not at any time produce any ID for me to verify he was who he claimed to be. Not even when he wrote out the checks and I asked for ID, he laughed and said, “I am me.” Mr. Parisi and his assistant Robert Braddock were rude and attitude changed considerably after the exam was done. They met behind closed doors for another hour or so with Gelb.

BHDC: What do you make of all of the false information that is being passed around on the Internet about you?

LS: I find it appalling that most of it is being paid for by Axelrod and the Obama camp by use of paid bloggers who are being fed information that Axelrod and Obama know to be false, know not to be me — but know that these kids will sit up and post it as fact and they (Axelrod and Obama) will not have to answer for it. But I say they will.

BHDC: Would you have come forward with your claims had you known what has happened would happen?

LS: I had put out everything about my past from the start, so I did not worry about what they tried to say about me. I will get vindication against all the knowingly false claims made when this is over because slander and libel is easy to prove when they keep repeating it after being told to retract it.

BHDC: Do you stand by your claims about Barack Obama 100 percent, given the polygraph results?

LS: 1,000 percent, and I have stated from day one, polygraph or not, I will not recant or back down because I am stating truthful claims.

BHDC: Some people will say Big Head DC is biased for even interviewing you. What should we say to those people?

LS: What is biased about trying to get to the truth? The bias is on those media outlets who see the false claims made against a U.S. citizen by a candidate for the president of the U.S., and they still do not report anything. The media knows these attacks against me and the claims made in these attacks are false but they ignore it.

BHDC: What do you make of Obama’s increasing popularity?

LS: Does the phrase “snake oil sales man” give you a hint?

BHDC: Do you think Obama has been well enough vetted on the national political stage?

LS: Obama is not even close to being vetted; everyone says I am a kook, well I am not a kook, and I expect that I am not going to be standing here alone much longer. I expect we will see others come forward before this is over.

BHDC: Have you recently spoken to the limo driver you say was with you and Obama in 1999? What does he think about what you’ve been put through? Has it discouraged him from coming forward?

LS: I placed a call to him Saturday that was not returned. I had spoken with him last week, and he thinks I am crazy for going through this over a lying fraud like Barack Obama and David Axelrod. I truly believe he will come forward, and he knows I am not going to back down.

BHDC: Who is your lawyer in the lawsuit against Obama?

LS: The suit will be dismissed, it will be re-filed. It is being dismissed for failing to state a claim in which entitles me to relief, not because as claimed by others I am not credible. I am attaching a copy for your verification of this statement. WH.com leaked that I was in talks with Gloria Allred to discourage her, which they accomplished.

BHDC: Have you heard from anyone in the Obama campaign since you came forward with your claims?

LS: I have not. I received an e-mail via YouTube asking me to confirm or deny claims made by some Ron Allen of the Obama camp, which I stated were false. I will attach. I will forward copy to you.

BHDC: When did you first realize that Obama was a U.S. Senator?

LS: I became aware he was a politician during watching the 2004 DNC speech while residing in Mexico.

BHDC: How is your health? Are you afraid that this publicity is harmful to your health?

LS: I have some very serious heath problems, which I deal with according to decisions that I made. I do not use my health as an excuse for anything. I live alone, I care for myself, I do not reside in any assisted living complex, nor do I receive an assistant in my daily life.

BHDC: What are you going to do next regarding this whole situation?

LS: I will continue to put my story out there. I am getting some assistance in amending the lawsuit for refiling, and please note, it has not yet been dismissed, nor has the recommendation to dismiss been received or written as claimed by the judge identified on the Web. I am not going away, I am not recanting anything, and I am fighting on, especially with the tip I received this date. I will do a polygraph arranged by me, video tape it non-edited and with the findings released before stopping the camera and will post it before Tuesday if all goes well.

Released emails from WhiteHouse.com to/from Larry Sinclair

2008-02-25T15:09:00.000-08:00

RE: Polygraph Offer‏
ALL EMAILS TO/FROM PARISI

From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Sat 2/16/08 11:10 AM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair

We will post the following sentence on the website including a copy of our offer to you with all the address and email information blocked out. “We are not affiliated in any way with any of the candidates or any of the parties. I have never met or communicated with David Axelrod or Barack Obama. Obviously since I never have met either of them I do not have friendship with either of them”.

We are trying to get Jack Trimarco which is who was your first choice anyway. If we cannot get him we will agree to get another world renowned expert which is mutually agreeable to both us.

Airfare and Transportation will be paid for but we will make the arrangements and pay for the services directly with the Airlines, Ground Transportation and Hotels. We can provide security during the test and when we pick you up in a Limo. All other times are not feasible. We might just do the test at your apartment as long as we are the only ones recording or videotaping the event that way there are no travel of security issues.

We will pay you the $10,000 when you arrive at the office or where you are to take the test at the scheduled time as you want but if you do not complete the test we would want the money back. As you know off reading the information on Mr. Trimarco’s site, a good polygraph test and prep takes about 4-5 hours.

You can bring an independent reporter/witness at their expense .We will be the only ones to record or videotape the event.

We will not make your time and date for your test public anytime before or during the test or we will pay you the $10,000. We cannot be responsible if someone else not on the Whitehouse.com staff including somebody on your side leaks or posts the information. It is not in our interest to leak any of the information prior or during the event.

Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

From: Lawrence Sinclair [mailto:lws022737@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 11:05 AM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: Polygraph Offer

I stated on your web site that I would agree to your offer with conditions. You can accept them or not it is your choice.

1. You must publicly acknowledge any relationship you have or had with David Axelrod or Barack Obama, if any, including friendships.

2. I pick the polygraph examiner and it must be shown they have no connections with any candidate of either party.

3. Airfare and transportation to and from the airport to hotel and your office is paid by Whitehouse.com in advance as are hotel arrangements and whitehouse.com pays for security to insure my safety due to the threats being level against me even from your web sites.

4. Payment of the Ten Thousand dollars ($10,000.00) must be made at the time of arrival at your offices not upon completion of the exam because their are no assurance that you will pay at the end of exam.

5. I am allowed to have an independent report with me at and during the polygraph exam through its entirity as witness.

6. My arrival date and time is not to be made public at any time and if it is, you will agree to pay the Ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) in default for placing my life in danger.

If you agree then I will notify you of the flight information for you to take care of the payment of such.

RE: Polygraph Offer‏

From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Sat 2/16/08 11:32 AM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair

We are good to go. I will get the arrangements over to you early in the week. Can you put on your You Tube account that we have come to an agreement and I will do the same on Whitehouse.com. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

WHiteHouse.com Inc.

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 12:25 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Polygraph Offer

This is acceptable to me. The test is to be done in New York. I am having enough problems at my apartment since the posting of my address and phone number on the web. I perfer to get this done as quickly as possible. The name of travel documents needs to be Lawrence (not Larry) Sinclair as that is how it appears on my passport and ID.

I assure you there is no one on my side to leak anything.

RE: Scheduling of polygraph‏

From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Sun 2/17/08 12:45 PM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair

We are going to try to get something scheduled by tomorrow. It is tough to get things done on the weekend. I will keep you posted when we have a date and time. Thanks

Dan Parisi

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 3:54 AM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: Scheduling of polygraph

I would like you to set this up as quickly as possible and if you can get this scheduled this week I am available to get this done.

I am confident that I will prevail and the sooner I do the sooner I can put a stop to a lot of these threats and this non-stop harrassment.

I appologize for my implying that you were connected with Axelrod or Obama, as it has it one of my supporters emailed me to inform me that he felt you are on the level and that there is no evidence to support any connection.

Thank you,

Lawrence (Larry) Sinclair

RE: Trimarco‏

From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Mon 2/18/08 10:27 AM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair

It is not a good idea to contact these people directly or post on boards which people are being contacted to administer the tests. This will interfere with us getting somebody for the tests. We are in the process today of getting someone to administer the test. Thanks

Dan Parisi

WhiteHouse.com

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 9:22 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: Trimarco

Based on Mr. Trimarcos contacting me and informing me he would respectfully decline administering the exam, I will assume that you can locate someone in your area that will meet the objective, unbiased, independent examiner.

RE: Trimarco‏

From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Mon 2/18/08 3:44 PM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair

We have Dr. Ed Gelb. He is a world renowned Polygraph expert. He can do it either on Friday or Saturday at his Offices in Los Angeles. We can make travel and hotel arrangements for you as soon as you give us which day is better. He has done testing in other high profile cases before and he was the Polygraph expert hired to verify the DC Madam’s allegations. His website is http://polygraphexpert.com/.

Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 1:07 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Trimarco

I contacted Mr. Trimarco before you had made your offer. I am not posting any thing, I had posted on youtube Friday morning that I had left a message for Mr. Trimarco. I will not post any others as I have not contacted any others since becoming aware of your offer.

Respectfully,

Lawrence Sinclair

RE: Trimarco‏

From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Mon 2/18/08 3:58 PM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair

I will have my assistant Editor Rob Braddock call you in 30 minutes and set everything up. He is from Los Angeles and he is knowledgeable on the hotels and the area.

Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 4:49 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Trimarco

Make the arrangements for departure from Duluth on Thursday, we will do the exam on friday and I return to duluth on Saturday..

If possible I would appreciate a non stop flight from Minneapolis to LAX for medical reasons. Contact via email or call me at 218-xxx-xxxx or my cell phone at 612-xxx-xxxx.

Thank you. RE: Trimarco‏

From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Mon 2/18/08 5:43 PM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair
Cc:
Rob Braddock (RBraddock@house.com)

Here is the air and Hotel information. Robert had talked that we will pick you at 2:00 on Thursday afternoon and we will drive together to airport and fly over to LA. You appointment is set with Dr. Gelb at 11:00 AM. on Friday. We will all drive to his office together as we will be staying at the same hotel. As Robert explained Dr. Gelb will also take a urine sample for drug testing. You had mentioned to Robert that you will be bringing all receipts and documentation in regards to the case. You have Robert’s number if you need to reach him and obviously we will be in communication between now and when we pick you up. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

WhiteHouse.com Inc.

Trip name: Los Angeles 2/21/08
Orbitz record locator: HHTG5T
Guest name: Larry Sinclair

Hotel name: Wilshire Grand Los Angeles
Address:
930 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA, US 90017
Phone number: 1-213-xxx-7777
Check-in date: Thu, Feb 21, 2008 (3:00 PM)
Check-out date: Sat, Feb 23, 2008 (12 Noon)
Total number of guests: 2
Total number of rooms: 1 room
Special Room - 2 double bed or 1 king bed
Special Requests: This property is entirely smoke-free, Non-smoking room

Passenger(s): LAWRENCE SINCLAIR

Northwest Airlines record locator: 4ZAWV9
Ticket type requested: electronic (e-ticket)
Orbitz record locator: AP1801014ZAWV930
Airline ticket number(s): 0127203581861
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Northwest Airlines # 309

Duluth International (DLH) to Minneapolis St Paul Intl (MSP)
Departure (DLH): February 21, 5:10 PM CST (evening)
Arrival (MSP): February 21, 6:02 PM CST (evening)
Class: Economy

Seat request: choose seats
| MSP
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Northwest Airlines # 309

Minneapolis St Paul Intl (MSP) to Los Angeles International (LAX)
Departure (MSP): February 21, 7:10 PM CST (evening)
Arrival (LAX): February 21, 9:15 PM PST (evening)

Seat request: choose seats
View real-time airport conditions and traveler updates at MSP | LAX
--------------------------------

Saturday, February 23, 2008
Northwest Airlines # 312

Los Angeles International (LAX) to Minneapolis St Paul Intl (MSP)
Departure (LAX): February 23, 12:15 PM PST (afternoon)
Arrival (MSP): February 23, 5:51 PM CST (evening)
Class: Economy

Seat request: choose seats
View real-time airport conditions and traveler updates at LAX | MSP
Saturday, February 23, 2008
Northwest Airlines # 1634

Minneapolis St Paul Intl (MSP) to Duluth International (DLH)
Departure (MSP): February 23, 9:33 PM CST (evening)
Arrival (DLH): February 23, 10:21 PM CST (evening)

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 4:59 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Trimarco

Ok, thats fine.

Good you did, I hung up on Warner Bros Television this morning.

Subject: RE: Trimarco
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:58:01 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

I will have my assistant Editor Rob Braddock call you in 30 minutes and set everything up. He is from Los Angeles and he is knowledgeable on the hotels and the area.

Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 4:49 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Trimarco

Make the arrangements for departure from Duluth on Thursday, we will do the exam on friday and I return to duluth on Saturday..

If possible I would appreciate a non stop flight from Minneapolis to LAX for medical reasons. Contact via email or call me at 218-xxx-xxxx or my cell phone at 612-xxx-xxxx.

Thank you.

RE: Trimarco‏

From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Tue 2/19/08 11:19 AM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair

I wanted to make sure you received the travel arrangements we sent you last night. We also going to be a doing a posting on the website today that you will be taking the test next Tuesday in New York City to throw everybody off from the test we have scheduled. Thanks

Dan Parisi

Whitehouse.com

RE: Trimarco‏

From:
Dan Parisi (DParisi@house.com)

Sent:
Tue 2/19/08 12:59 PM

To:
Lawrence Sinclair

We will check the IP address of the guy. We will change the hotel as well to a hotel where there is smoking and non smoking rooms. Thanks

Dan Parisi

Whitehouse.com Inc.

From: Lawrence Sinclair
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 1:47 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Trimarco

Yes, Rob spoke with me and that is fine. I would like to ask that if possible, Whitehouse find out who the dear murray dot com is and who his server is because he is turning into a stalker and it is starting to truly concern me.

I assume Rob or you have printed the e-tickets for the flight? Correct?

Also, There is NO mental health issues as being claimed by Murray and the others.

I have with my doctors permission stooped taking all narcotic pain medications since Saturday so as no one can claim I was medicated to alter the results of the polygraph. I want this to be as credible as possible.

Thank you,

Lawrence Sinclair

RE: Dear murray‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 9:29 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

Have Rob call me I have a different figure in mind and part of that figure I would want split into two separate certified or cashiers checks payable to two charities. It will still be a lot less than you will lose when I pass this test. Add 10K to what you suggests and have 5k each payable to the following

1. Duluth Salvation Army Housing Loan Program

and

2. Girls and Boys Club of Duluth

Let me know what you think?

Subject: RE: Dear murray
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:42:04 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

If you want we can do this. We give you 20k either way instead of the way we have it and maybe you give $2,000 or 10% to charity. If you do that way then you get rid of all these bribe accusations. You will also look very good to the media and public as well. Thanks

Dan Parisi

Whitehouse.com

From: Lawrence Sinclair [mailto:
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:03 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: Dear murray

dear murray is posting on WH under the user name hahahaha stating you are "you are bribbing me to pass polygraph" and he is consulting his attorney whether your actions constitute a federal crime.

RE: Dear murray‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 9:35 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

If you want to do this without doing the 100K yes, Because even the part coming to me is going to pay my mothers back bills and medication so yes, if that is acceptable to you. You still have all exclusive rights to video as you want, and I still agree that no other polygraphs can be done for 4 weeks.

Subject: RE: Dear murray
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:31:06 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

Are you saying 20k to you and 5k each to the following two strategies. Thanks

Dan P

RE: Dear murray‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair )

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 9:44 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

This will be announced by both of us jointly after the test is done and I am home safely. I have to get things ready here for my departure. Will talk later.

Subject: RE: Dear murray
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:41:31 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

That s fine. We will bring all three company checks tomorrow to the testing. They will not be certified but we are a big organization here so I do not see where there is any issue. They will be Whitehouse.com Inc checks signed by me. Thanks

Dan Parisi

Whitehouse.com

RE: Dear murray‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 10:01 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

You can post that if you send it to me to view prior to posting. Also I would appreciate it if you would make the point that the flat fee is for the rights to video tape and broadcast exclusively.

Subject: RE: Dear murray
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:58:52 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

We will have final results in on Monday so you will be home by then. As soon as we have the results we will let you know what the verbal results are. We can then both go out at same time with results but whitehouse.com will be the only ones with the written results and video which we will post on Whitehouse.com site. I would like to post a story this afternoon saying how you are not taking one flat fee for taking the test with 1/3 going to charity as you really want to get your story out and you do not want any taint of you being paid extra to get a positive result with leaving the test times as still being next Tuesday. We will not name the amounts. I think that would be a very positive thing to do. Thanks

Dan P

RE: Dear murray‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 10:10 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

You can post this afternoon what you wanted to post, after all this is a business that you need to continue operating in the best possible light to continue to be profitable, I just do not want anyone saying I am charging to agree to take the polygraph. I am indebted for all the attention you have brought to this issue.

Subject: RE: Dear murray
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:07:24 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

We will send you copy to look at before we post it. We will probably not post anything on it until we get back from the trip. Thanks

Dan P

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Thu 2/21/08 1:43 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

There is a problem with the wording as follows "If he passes......." The agreement is rather than put a price on passing we agreed to a flat fee of which 10k goes to charities listed. Only change Salvation Army Housing Loan Program to the Salvation Army, because that way they can use the money where ever they have the greatest need.

That is the only problem I see is the word "If".

Subject: RE: Dear murray
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:48:41 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

How is this for a posting.

Larry Sinclair wants to change the payout of our polygraph challenge

and we've agreed. If he passes the test, he wants only enough money to

pay off some outstanding debt of his mother's for the exclusive rights

to the video and results. He also wants $10,000 paid out to a couple of Minnesota

charities: the Duluth Salvation Army Housing Loan Program and the

Girls and Boys Club of Duluth. That seems perfectly reasonable to us

the most penny-pinching of free spenders, and so we've agreed.

We'd like to note at this point that our fascination with Sinclair's

claims doesn't have much to do with Barack Obama. We'd just as soon

take on any other candidate, and, in fact, we already have.

To reiterate the statement we made before, WhiteHouse.com, nor any

of it's writers or staff are in any way affiliated with any of the

presidential campaigns and, along those same lines, we are in no way

a subsidiary of or contractor for the CIA or any such organization, as has

been suggested. We lay no claim to any ideological agenda; ours is to to

seek out the truth in this bizarre story.Any suggestion to the contrary is

conspiracy theory or wishful thinking or both.

Thanks

Dan Parisi

Whitehouse.com Inc.

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sat 2/23/08 4:47 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

I am prepared to give you the chance to save $2500 by you providing me with $2500 cash and re-writing the $20,000.00 check for $15,000.00 check and I return to you the $20,000.00 check so that I can remain here un til monday morning and I pay the cost from saturday thru Monday myself to get this out in the MSM.

I will need you to respond by 1:00 PM today. That is a savings to you of an additional $2500.00 dollars.

Please contact me by calling the room at x 207 or pounding on the room door.

Thank you

Larry Sinclair

Questions‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 12:11 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

Is there a reason that Murray would be in LA, know where I was staying and even know that I went to dinner last night with a couple of friend that you can explain to me?

Why did you fail to mention when I called this afternoon you posted my drug test results? Or fail to mention to me that you had received the results?

The hotel records were shown to you at your request, however I made it clear no one was posting those on the web. Our arrangement in fact did not even seek any of the records I provided you. I do hope that you are going to honor our agreement.

I also am starting to feel a little uneasy with the amount of time you guys spent with Dr. Gelf outside my pressence. I am simply stating a fact that I am beginning to feel a little uneasy because of that and the manner inwhich you guys are posting stuff.

Maybe is is just my being tired.

(No Subject)‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 11:43 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

I at no time have told you I would give you the limo drivers number. I at no time made any promises to you about the driver. I am being asked here by a local reporter if I have any reason to believe the checks payable from you on the charties are not good. I told her that you assured me they are good.

RE: Questions‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair (lws022737@hotmail.com)

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 11:49 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

So you have had Dr. Gelbs results as I expected since Friday. I do want the name of the second expert. Oh I believe you say would you provide me a copy of these results, those from the experts.

Subject: RE: Questions
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:12:57 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws

We are going to be releasing the results of the two polygraph tests taken on Friday today at 11:30 EST. They are the results provided by Dr. Gelb. We will post the results of the second Polygraph examiner when we receive them. Thanks

Dan Parisi

Whitehouse.com

RE: Questions‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 11:51 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

Excuse me Mr. Parisi, I NEVER SAID I WOULD HAVE THE LIMO DRIVER IN CONTACT WITH YOU, so please do not start making such claims. I said I would ask the driver if he wanted to speak with you.

Subject: RE: Questions
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:33:49 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To:

Since you have not gotten back to us we have moved back the release of the test results to Noon today EST which is about 30 minutes from now. You had said you would have had the limousine driver in contact with us by now but we have not heard anything on that either. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.

RE: Questions‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 12:17 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

I told you and Rob I would try to put you in contact with the driver. Last night when I spoke with you I told you I would deal with calling the driver today, I did not tell you I would put you or anyone else in contact with him by 12:00 noon. You said you would call me at 12 noon ET. today.

Subject: RE: Questions
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:14:36 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To:

You told both me and Rob in person that you were going to put us in contact with the limousine driver. You told me last night you were going to do it today. I said 12:00 Noon and you agreed. 12:00:00 PM has come and gone. We have not heard anything on the limo driver. Thanks

Dan P

RE: Questions‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 12:20 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

No, I can not and will not, you are posting that I lied, why would I put him in the middle of your firestorm now.

Subject: RE: Questions
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:19:16 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To:

It is past 12:00. We called you several times already today. Can you put us in touch with him now. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.

RE: Questions‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 12:37 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

Mr. Parisi, I told you I would contact the driver. Now lets not get into you building this up anyway you want. I never said I would make this man talk to you. I have all my communiction with you.

Subject: RE: Questions
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:26:49 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To:

As we spoke about on Friday. You had mentioned that the driver called Obama on Saturday November 6 from his cell phone and later Obama himself made a call on his cell phone to procure the drugs. If that was true you would then have 2 cell phone records for that date so there is no reason for the driver to be hiding. Also if he was indeed a friend of Obama that would come out as well. You told us you were going to put us in touch with him to corroborate your story and you did not. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

Whitehouse.com Inc.

RE: Questions‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 4:16 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

I will expect a copy of the written results. I never stated that you were to give me the original results. I stated clearly in my email to you accepting your offer the conditions which included a copy of the results being made available to me. And I have to wait 4 weeks before I can do another polygraph with anyone else.

As long as we live up to the agreement we are fine. I have placed a call to him that has not been returned.

Subject: RE: Questions
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:10:52 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To:

We are not going to bounce any of the checks. What news organization are you giving the charity checks to. In my email to you on Thursday. I said “As soon as we have the results we will let you know what the verbal results are. We can then both go out at same time with results but whitehouse.com will be the only ones with the written results and video which we will post on Whitehouse.com site.” I think that is pretty clear we will be keeping written results. We have no problem sending you a copy of the written results as we will post them on the website. We are still waiting for a typed copy of the report as we only have a handwritten copy which was faxed this afternoon to us. As soon as we receive the typed report we will fax it over to you. Have you gotten in touch with Limousine driver so we can talk to him. Thanks

Dan Parisi

President

WhiteHouse.com Inc.

From: Lawrence Sinclair [mailto:lws022737@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 1:42 PM
To: Dan Parisi
Subject: RE: Questions

The charities are concerned about the checks you wrote not being honorred. I would appreciate you emailing me a statement or posting one on your site making it clear that the checks issued by Whitehouse dor com are good and will be honorred.

Thank you.

Larry Sinclair

RE: Questions‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 4:19 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

I do not understand why you are not willing to fax or attach to an email the handwritten results as well, but whatever. You answered the more important question. I am giving the checks to a local reporter with NBC 6, there is going to be no part of the Obama thing reported on, she is going to present the checks for me to both on Monday. I am not even going to be there. Her name is M. Lee and they are not mentioning the Obama thing at all. It is a simple pay it forward story.

Can you explain the below email received in youtube email box to me‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Sun 2/24/08 8:47 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

fyi

www.antipolygraph.com/articles/article-036.shtml Gelb has
publicly claimed to hold a Ph.D. degree in psychology since at least
1996. I***997, he represented himself as a Ph.D. to the highest court
in the land -- the United States Supreme Court -- as a co-signer of
the Committee of Concerned Social Scientists' amicus brief in U.S. v.
Scheffer, where he is listed as "Ed Gelb, Ph.D." No, the "LaSalle
University" that awarded Gelb his "doctorate" turns out to be a
defunct, unaccredited diploma mill in Mandeville, Louisiana that was
owned and operated by one Thomas James Kirk, A.K.A. Thomas McPherson.
I***996, LaSalle was raided by the FBI, and i***997 Kirk pled guilty
to federal fraud charges. (For more on the bogus LaSalle
University, Mr. Edward I. Gelb is no Ph.D., and he should stop
masquerading as such.

(No Subject)‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Mon 2/25/08 1:46 AM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

So you were in fact hired by Mr. Axelrod after all. You think $750,000 is enough money to protect your interests from all the crap that is going to hit over this little piece of information I was sent this morning?

I am releasing all our email communication later along with the information about WH and Axelrods little dispute over the matter of you not being paid all of your money and over you not posting everything that was asked of you as fast as they asked you to.

And I will be contacting Mr. Gelb who turns out not to be a DR after all.

I hope just one of your checks fails to be honored by the bank, because that will give me the personal determination to shut you down.

Looks like you are exactly what I figured you to be from the start.

You can say whatever you want, I do not believe a word out of your mouth now.

Be ready to disclose all your accounts and businesses.

Sincerely

Larry Sinclair

RE: Here are the typed Polygrpah reports‏

From:
Lawrence Sinclair

Sent:
Mon 2/25/08 2:46 PM

To:
Dan Parisi (dparisi@house.com)

I assume by your failure to reply you are denying prior knowledge of misrepresentations by Mr. Gelb and the information I received early this morning advising me that you were paid $750,000 by Axelrod associates to set me up? Do I assume correctly.

Subject: Here are the typed Polygrpah reports
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:09:32 -0500
From: DParisi@house.com
To: lws0
Here are the links to the typed polygraph reports. We will be posting them on the site in about 5 minutes. You can access them now before the general public gets the link. Thanks

Larry Sinclair's official polygraph results from controversial Dr. Gelb

2008-02-25T13:49:00.000-08:00

Larry is not backing down

2008-02-25T13:02:00.000-08:00

Today it has surfaced on the internet that Mr. Sinclair apologized and confessed he was lying in the following statment;

This is Larry Sinclair. First. I am posting this message in venues where I know my situation is discussed.First off, let me apologize for the roller coaster ride I have put some of you through(myself included). I have been going through various issues as of late, and have been having quite a tough time. I sincerely appreciate all the support I have received from ALL OF YOU(you know who you are). However, I think it's time this all was finished. I was not being honest. I did not give oral sex to Barak Obama, nor have I ever met him. I have just been extremely lonely lately, and I guess I needed attention. I want to assure you all the money I recieved from this(both from whitehouse.com and The Globe Magazine) will ALL go to charity. When all is said and done, I will NOT HAVE PROFITED from this. Now that I have disclosed this, I hope you all will respect my right to privacy, and let it rest. I have made some good friends during this, and will always cherish and respect the ones who have helped me.

Thank you,
Larry Sinclair

This is not from Larry he just sent me an email and asked me to let everyone know that this did not come from him and it is a hoax. He is going to keep fighting.

Larry Sinclair's initial email to Obama's campaign

2008-02-25T11:36:00.000-08:00

Sent: Mon 2/04/08 11:43 PM
To: info@akpmedia.com

This message is for David Axelrod. My name is Larry Sinclair. Attempts to leave messages for you with the Obama headquarters have not gone well.

I have been informed that you personally have stated the claims in my youtube video are untrue. I also understand that you personally in your capacity with the Obama camp has stated the Obama camp is conducting an investigation into me and my associates.

I have contacted legal counsel and have asked that civile litigation be filed forthwith against you and the Obama camp for conducting investigations in an attempt to prevent my truthful allegations against your candidate from becoming public and a national scale. I am also asking counsel to take action to determine if you and or the Obama camp have violated any federal or state laws in the funding of your invesstigation and/or attempts to keep the truth out of the election process.

Understand all you have to do is ask me about me, because I have been 100% open and honest about my life and every aspect of it.

I am sick of threats being sent by Obama staff and supporters, I am sick of Obama bloggers using edited versions of my video to slam other candidates who have nothing to do with me or my video.

I have notified the DNC that I intend to take action against them as well for ignoring complaint filed by me with them regarding your statements about the purpose for the posting of my video.

Understand you do not know me, and I assure you I will stand my ground on this, and I will defend myself against the false claims being made against me by you, Obama's camp, paid or unpaid staffers, and Mr. Obama personally if I find him to have knowledge of your actions.

I suggest you address this matter because I assure you it will not be going away anytime soon.

Larry Sinclair goes on the offensive

2008-02-25T11:11:00.000-08:00

This was sent to me by Mr. Sinclair about an hour ago.

THE FOLLOWING WAS POSTED BY ME ON WHITEHOUSE DOT COM A FEW MOMENTS AGO. MR. PARISI HAS FAILED TO REPLY TOANY EMAILS SENT HIM SINCE YESTERDAY AFTERNOON. I AM CONTACTING THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION THIS DATE HAS WELL.

Obama and Axelrod are paying $750,000 to WH's Dan Parisi for this
scam he set up which is now falling apart in front of his eyes. It
is amazing what kind of information people send you when they see you
being screwed over. I am posting all email communications between
Parisi and I at larrysinclair0926dotspacesdotlive*** in a couple of
hours. I am doing so because Parisi has failed to adhere to terms of
the agreement and his terms will mke it clear the info I received
early this morning fits perfectly with his desire to prevent me from
going to another polygraph expert before the primaries.

Statement from Larry Sinclair concerning alleged failed polygraph

2008-02-25T03:57:00.000-08:00

STATEMENT FROM LARRY SINCLAIR

I am making this statement regarding the claims recently made against me and attributted to the WASHINGTON POST.

FIRST

The claims that I have an “extensive record of drug convictions” is in fact completely false and according to both the national new desk and city desk at the Washington Post has never been reported by anyone employed at this newspaper.

SECOND

The claims made that I “have been investigated eight times over the past 25 years for trying to secure money through “black male” and two of those involving politicians in IL and IN” also is in fact false and according to the Washington Post has never been reported by anyone employed at this newspaper.

THIRD

Dan Parisi of Whitehouse dot com has decided to ignore the conditions and agreement we entered into regarding the polygraph examination. Mr. Parisis has failed to provide the identity and contact information on the second Expert and in doing so has never obtained any agreement from me for using this individual.

Mr. Parisi failed to provide information that I recently received from emails from people I do not even know, which shows Dr. Edward Ira Gelb has in fact misrepresented his own credentials before a case filed in front of the US Supreme Court. (attached below)

fyi

www.antipolygraph.com/articles/article-036.shtml Gelb has
publicly claimed to hold a Ph.D. degree in psychology since at least
1996. I***997, he represented himself as a Ph.D. to the highest court
in the land -- the United States Supreme Court -- as a co-signer of
the Committee of Concerned Social Scientists' amicus brief in U.S. v.
Scheffer, where he is listed as "Ed Gelb, Ph.D." No, the "LaSalle
University" that awarded Gelb his "doctorate" turns out to be a
defunct, unaccredited diploma mill in Mandeville, Louisiana that was
owned and operated by one Thomas James Kirk, A.K.A. Thomas McPherson.
I***996, LaSalle was raided by the FBI, and i***997 Kirk pled guilty
to federal fraud charges. (For more on the bogus LaSalle
University, Mr. Edward I. Gelb is no Ph.D., and he should stop
masquerading as such.

In addition Mr. Parisi and his assistant refused to inform or allow me to be present during their meetings with Dr. Gelb in his office before, during and after the exams. Mr. Parisi and his assistant spent approximately two hours behind closed doors with Dr. Gelb before I was even introduced to him. During the examination process Dr. Gelb printed something off his computer and left the room telling me he would be back in five, only to return some 30 to 45 minutes later with Parisi’s assistant and an associate of Dr. Gelbs and then asked me to step out side for another 20 minutes before calling me back in to proceed with the exam.

FOURTH

Tonight (2-24-08) after Mr. Parisi refused to respond to my emails I posted on Whitehouse dot com the fact that Parisi this afternoon claimed he had not sent me copy of the results because he had not received them. Shortly after making that statement this afternoon Parisi’s assistant called saying they would fax the results in 15 minute, needless to say that never happened. Later Parisi claimed he had only then received a handwritten report faxed this date to him from Dr. Gelb and that he would wait to fax me the typed report.

If Mr. Parisi fails to comply with our agreement by Monday 2-25-08 I will post all email communications with him concerning this matter and which clearly state the conditions for this arrangement. These emails will clearly show Mr. Parisi did not follow our agreement and I will consider at that time what course of action should be taken. It is only natural that I would become suspicious of Mr. Parisi after finding out he has misrepresented this expert, he has claimed I was examined by two (2) experts of which I agreed and yet I only met one and still have not been given the contact information to this date on the second.

It needs to be made perfectly clear that I have from the very beginning demand all of this be done openly and with credible, unbiased, and apolitical individuals. These facts about Dr. Gelb make it hard for me to believe that Mr. Parisi can claim this person is unbiased and credible when he has misrepresented himself before the highest court in this Country.

Mr. Parisi’s claims that I approved both experts is untrue because I was never given this person whole name or any contact information on him/her. I was simply told Gordo something in Salt Lake City.

Thank you,

Larry Sinclair
2-24-08

In the email I received from Mr. Sinclair he says the following;

"I have receive a tip informing me that some communications between David Axelrod and Whitehouse dot com was obtained and was some wrangling over the fact that WH has not posted everything that Obama's camp wanted posted as fast as they wanted and about half of the $750,000 paid to WH to set me up has yet to be paid because of this delay. Mr. Parisi is not happy at all.

This may also explain why Parisi went out of his way to keep his face down and not looking up at me the entire time.

Well, I guess now we will just have to follow the money trial."

Update on Larry Sinclair and the alleged failed polygraph tests

2008-02-24T18:05:00.000-08:00

According to WhiteHouse.com Larry showed signs of deception in both tests concerning the sex and drug questions. I received an email from Larry and he is very aggrivated because WhiteHouse.com has kept him in the dark today. Acording to Larry it is a "suspicious situation". WhiteHouse.com delayed the initial results earlier today and promised the report of the tests would be made this afternoon. It's now 9:15 Eastern Time and no report has surfaced.

Also according to http://antipolygraph.org/articles/article-036.shtml Dr. Ed Gelb, the man who was selected by WhiteHouse.com to administer the tests never earned a doctoral degree from any accredited university.

Larry told me that he will keep fighting.

More to come, this is just getting started...

Deception claimed in polygraph test

2008-02-24T08:54:00.000-08:00

This is just breaking but according to Dr. Ed Gelb Larry used deception when asked about drugs and sex with Obama. There was a second test administered and the results will be made available later.

Larry Sinclair claims he passed the polygraph test

2008-02-23T10:29:00.000-08:00

Accoring to a comment he made on his Youtube page Mr. Sinclair has passed the polygraph test. He was attacked by some people who left disrespectful comments and Mr. Sinclair lashed out and told some of the details of the polygraph test.

He posted some comments on the page and names the Limo Driver as is P. Multani from the 5 Star Limo Service as the driver of the limo that he used with Senator Obama.

He is also donating some of the money from WhiteHouse.com to charity.

Sinclair takes the polygraph test early

2008-02-23T07:21:00.000-08:00

According to WhiteHouse.com Mr. Sinclair took the polygraph test yesterday. There was an issue concerning Mr. Sinclair's safety so it was moved up unannounced. Larry has told me that the death threats and phone calls in the middle of the night have gotten worse so this does make sense.

According to the site the results are being verified right now and should be made public on Monday or Tuesday.

February 26 The truth will be known

2008-02-19T15:09:00.000-08:00

According to WhiteHouse.com Mr. Sinclair has agreed to take the polygraph test in New York City on 2-26. Due to safety concerns the site will remain undisclosed. The polygraph test will be administered by an expert. The results will be immediately verified by a second expert. Mr. Sinclair has made it clear to me he wants to test to be given by an independent third party that is a leader lie detection tests.

He only agreed to do it for WhiteHouse.com after their President issued a statement about not being affiliated with any candidate. I believe that a lot of people think that the Clinton campaign may be behind this. Mr. Sinclair wants people to understand he is doing this without any support from any Presidential candidate.

I'm looking forward to next Tuesday.

Larry Sinclair agrees to take polygraph test

2008-02-17T10:02:00.000-08:00

As reported Mr. Sinclair has agreed to take a polygraph test. WhiteHouse.com made him an offer of $10,000 to take it and an additional $90,000 if he passes it. Mr. Sinclair made the President of the website, Dan Parisi declare that he is not affiliated with any cadidate to elimiate any bias and agree to have an independent member of the media present to confirm the results.

The person/group that will conduct the polygraph is a leader in the polygraph field. Mr. Sinclair expressed to me who he wanted to conduct it, and I can assure you the person/group is legitimate. But I'm not sure who WhiteHouse.com and he agreed upon so it could be another party. The date that Mr.Sinclair will take the test has remained a secret due to security precautions. As reported earlier Mr. Sinclair has received death threats and threatening phone calls pretty much at any and all hours since this began.

When the test is given the results will be released the same day on the WhiteHouse.com site. They are filming the entire procedure.

Larry Sinclair story snowballs through the internet

2008-02-16T14:55:00.000-08:00

This is story that refuses to die. Recently, Larry Sinclair received an offer by WhiteHouse.com to take a polygraph test. From what I understand Larry has accepted and will be taking it soon.

This is from WhiteHouse.com

We have been in contact with Mr. Sinclair and he has asked Dan Parisi, the President of WhiteHouse.com Inc. to publicly make the following statement showing that he has no affilation with any of the candidates which Dan Parisi does as follows:

"We are not affiliated in any way with any of the candidates or any of the parties. I have never met or communicated with David Axelrod or Barack Obama. Obviously since I never have met either of them I do not have a friendship with either of them”.

Here is a copy of the offer letter sent to Mr. Sinclair yesterday with the address and email address blocked out.

WhiteHouse.com Inc
xxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
xxxxxxxx,xxxxxxx

2/15/2008

Larry Sinclair

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxx
xxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxx

Dear Mr. Sinclair:

We have seen your video that you have made in regards to your relationship with Mr. Barack Obama. We are offering you $10,000 to just show up within the next 10 days and take a multi-question polygraph test administered by a professional at our offices which will be videotaped and broadcasted. We will also have to be the first and only entity that you will be taking a polygraph test with on this matter in the past or over the next four weeks. We will get and pay for your air fare and two nights at a hotel while you are here at our offices and you will be paid the $10,000 at the end of the test. If you successfully pass the polygraph test and it shows that you are telling the truth and you indeed did drugs with Senator Obama and had sex with Senator Obama we will pay you and additional $90,000. Please respond to me by email at xxxxx@xxxxx by February 21, 2008 to accept the offer or it will expire.

Very Truly Yours

Dan Parisi

Mr. Sinclair has received death threats recently but has vowed to fight on. On his Youtube page he has taken matters into his own hands and listed some of the people and phone numbers that have called him.

Sinclair takes Obama to court

2008-02-14T12:13:00.001-08:00

Proof Mr. Sinclair has indeed decided to fight the Obama campaign.

This action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1981, 18 U.S.C. 241 and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution’s right to Freedom of Speech. Defendants have and continue to conspire against the rights of citizens in that they are actively engaged in ongoing internet intimidation, claim to be conducting illegal investigations into plaintiff’s personal life, actively involved in preventing allegations of illegal drug use and sexual activity involving Defendant Obama from becoming public knowledge.

Plaintiff states that he personally engaged in sexual activity and personally used illegal drugs in November 1999 with U.S. Senator Barack Obama on two separate occasions. Plaintiff states that he attempted to contact defendant Obama in the fall of 2007 to advise defendant Obama to make his 1999 use of illegal drugs public himself and that if he did not do so then plaintiff would have no choice but to come forward as defendants’ actions were relevant to his running for President of the United States. Defendant Obama ignored plaintiffs attempts to allow defendant Obama to reveal this information on his own.

Larry Sinclair returns

2008-02-13T12:29:00.000-08:00

This thing really hasn't exploded like I thought it would. I imagine someone will pick it up before too much longer. I've been contacted by some members of the press wanting me to hook them up with Mr. Sinclair. I do not know Mr. Sinclair. I have exchanged emails with him but I do not know him personally. He posted some new videos a few days ago.

He says that the Obama campaign is investigating him since the first video was posted. He is now pursuing legal action against Obama in civil court.

Getting very interesting...

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Money can buy you happiness but it can't make you President

2008-02-07T12:28:00.001-08:00

I find it very hard to feel sorry for Mitt Romney. He's the good looking guy with the good looking family who has a couple of houses and 200 million dollars in the bank. I can also see through the BS announcement today about how he was withdrawing from the GOP field. He's says he loves his country enought to bow out so we can all get behind the front-runner Senator John McCain.

Wow, I'm floored. Mitt is doing what is best for the country. Nevermind the fact that he didn't want to lose anymore of his money. This is what I've hated about this guy all along. He's so phony and fake. He's not one of us. He just wants to tell us what to do. What more can you want when you have a lot of money and a little power? A lot more power. He saw that his millions couldn't buy American votes and he got out. He doesn't give a damn about the party or John McCain. He's cutting his losses instead of blowing more of his kids inheritence. If he was really wanted to do what's best for the country he would donate half of his money to various charities. I don't see that happening though.

This reminded me of Wrestlemania 4. The Million Dollar Man, Ted DiBiase thought he could pay Andre the Giant to beat Hulk Hogan and give him the Championship belt. All seemes to go to his evil plan when Andre beat Hogan but the WWF commissionar announced that DiBiase couldn't buy the title and a tournament was planned for Wrestlemania 4 for title. DiBiase made it to the finals but ultimately lost to "Macho Man" Randy Savage. I know wrestling is fake but I just thought it symbolized Romney's strategy all along. Buy off voters and take home the prize that you couldn't earn yourself.

Too bad Ron Paul's not the "Macho Man".

Electile Dysfunction

2008-02-06T12:11:00.001-08:00

Is anyone really happy with the candidates that are running for President? It's almost like we have to pick between a D- or an F. Congress has anywhere between a 20-30% approval rating but yet we have to pick someone from there to lead our coutry.

Mitt Romney is a guy who has changed all his positions from the time he was running for Govenor in a liberal state to now as he's pandering to the conservative right. Abortion? He was for pro-choice now he's pro-life. He's a big rich phony trying to buy his way into the White House. Change to him is anything short of a hundered dollar bill in his pocket.

John McCain is a guy who was a POW in Vietnam. He served his country honorably and after he was freed he chose to go into politics. He started out as a "Maverick". He did things his way but yet over the years he has conformed to Washington's ways. He was thrown under the bus by Bush and Rove back in 2000 when they used some slimy campaigning tactics insinuating that McCain fathered a child in Vietnam to a Vientamese woman. They then distributed that lie all around South Carolina and killed any chace he had at winning the GOP nomination. Then over the years he became one of the President's lackeys. He was during the build up the war in Iraq and now he's talking about getting elected and having more wars. Who wants to hear that during an election? He even sang a song on the campaign trail last year changing the words to the Beach Boys classic "Barbara Ann" to Bomb Iran. He's also been in trouble for initially proposing amnesty for illegal immigrants. Now he's seen the light and is against it.

Mike Huckabee is using his bass guitar and sermons to court the Christian base but it's apparent he's playing for 2nd place. He'll be on ticket as the VP.

Ron Paul has never flip-flopped on an issue or taken money from special interests groups. Too bad those same groups control 90% of the media in our country and he has been black-balled. He legitemately has very little shot at winning the nomination.

Hillary Clinton thinks that being the First Lady for 8 years is on the job training. She thinks she's ready to be President. Too bad most people see her as having a sense of entitlement and as a phony. Crying? There's crying in politics. She led the fight for Universal Health Care as the First Lady but once she got the Senate she started taking money from their lobbyists. She was also voted for the war in Iraq then changed her mind but yet voted to consider the Iranian Army a terrorist organization which basically gave the President a way to start a war with Iran.

Barack Obama is going to be our next President. C'mon Oprah Winfrey and MTV loves this guy. That's the same crowd that got Bill Clinton elected. He's pandered to the Hispanic population about giving illegals drivers license. I have a feeling that will come up in the general election. He's got a lot of hype and I have some concerns because he has only been in the Senate since January 2005. Maybe that's a good thing. We don't need someone who has been part of the establishment.

It's just too bad that there aren't any good 3rd or 4th parties. I think Americans deserve more (and better) choices. It's possible you'll see Ralph Nader, Michael Bloomber, and Ron Paul go for an Independent Bid but it won't matter because they won't be included in any of the debates and the networks whose parent corporations won't give them any money or exposure.

I honestly don't want to vote for anyone running. I guess I, like alot of Americans have electile disfunction.

RonPaulsRevenge.com

2008-01-30T12:58:00.000-08:00

I have followed Ron Paul since last May after the first debate. I have accepted that Dr. Paul will not win the GOP nomination. I think all along all Dr. Paul wanted to do was bring attention to how far we have strayed from what our founding father's intended. He has been pretty successful and without the mainstream media behind him he did fairly well. So where does Dr. Paul go from here?

I'd like to see him run on a 3rd party ticket but I know that is not going to be successful either. The future of Ron Paul is in all of his followers. All of the organization that Dr. Paul has set up should remain in place and used for his supporters to run for office. There have been 2 or 3 supporters that are indeed doing that. I say we need to buy the domain name RonPaul's Revenge.com or something similar and start going after each GOP Presidential candidate's office or previous office.

Let's start small. Congressman Duncan Hunter has said that he will not run for reelection. Why not go after his seat? I'm sure we can start there. After his seat we will go after Sam Brownback's senate seat in Kansas. We go after every single candidate that shared the stage with Dr. Paul. Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, and Rudy Giuliani aren't presently in office. So what let's get the ball rolling and make a statement. Let's get a Paul disciple in the Governor of Arkansas and Massachusetts's office. Mayor of New York city? Hey, it'll be hard but nothing a bunch of passionate, dedicated Ron Paul followers can't get done.

Dr. Paul fought hard and is still fighting. I think the next step is for us, his followers to follow in his footsteps and bring this country back to where it needs to be. Ron Paul's Revenge could be what this country really needs.

Obama could be in big, big trouble

2008-01-21T16:00:00.000-08:00

If this is true Obama is done. There have been rumors about Obama experimenting with drugs as a teen. Even people from Hillary Clinton's camp have said that something big was coming out about Obama back around Christmas. Could this be it? I don't really care for Obama but I don't like Hillary Clinton . Eventually Obama will have to respond.

Presidential Candidates on the Simpsons

2008-01-08T13:24:00.000-08:00

Rudy Guiliani is Mr. Burns

Fred Thompson is Superintendent Chalmers

Mike Huckabee is Cletus

Mitt Romney is Troy McClure

John McCain is Grandpa

Ron Paul is Moe

Hillary Clinton is Mrs. Krabbapel

Barack Obama is Carl

John Edwards is Mayor Quimby

Dennis Kucinich is Milhouse

And Bill Richardson is of course...Bumblebee Man

4 thoughts from New Hampshire debate

2008-01-06T10:19:00.000-08:00

After watching the debates last night I came away with 4 thoughts;

1. Will Rudy Guiliani bring back the military draft?
He said last night that he wants to add 250,000 troops if he is elected. The army is having so much trouble recruiting they are offering up to $40,000 in signing bonuses to new recruits. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that recruiting is going to be harder while we are fighting two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Who wants to sign up when they know they are going to be sent off to God knows where for God knows how long. Now with our stop loss policy our leaders can extend a soldiers contract without their consent. So where is Rudy going to get a quarter of a million troops his first year in office?

Did Rudy serve in the military? No, he received a deferment and never went to Vietnam.

2. Mitt Romney was exposed and owned by John McCain.
According to John McCain Romney is the candidate of "change". That was a great zinger considering he has flip-flopped and changed his position so many times. Romney comes across as the GOP's version of John Kerry. He's a super rich and will say anything to get elected. McCain has been pretty consistent with his positions whether I agree with them or not. I thought to myself that Mitt should have just layed down in the floor and let the other 5 candidates kick him in the ribs. I belive the American people are starting to see through him.

3. Hillary Clinton is done.
She seemed desperate and aggrivated. It seems she thought that she would run through the primaries on her last name and she would easily defeat the Republican candidate. Now it looks like the media has jumped on the Obama bandwagon and Hillary will be lucky to be competitive on Super Tuesday.

4. Obama/Paul 2008 would be an unbeatable ticket.
Congressman Paul has said that he will not endorse the GOP candidate as long as they are for the war in Iraq. Last night he said that he had a lot of respect for Senator Obama and his position on the war. The question is would Paul join the ticket if Obama asked him to be his running mate? Would Obama even ask? Those two candidates are the ones who represent the most change. Both are very popular with young voters and I just don't see any combination on the GOP side that could defeat them. How fired up would young voters be for Obama/Paul compared to McCain/Thompson or Huckabee/Guiliani. Obama isn't going to pick Hillary, Edwards, or Richardson. Paul would be a great fit. It is unlikely but if I was Obama I would consider it.

Ron Paul is a player in the GOP race right now

2008-01-04T13:57:00.000-08:00

After looking at the results of the Iowa caucuses last night I realized something. Ron Paul has a shot. The results are as follows;
Huckabee-34%
Romney-25%
Thompson and McCain-13%
Paul-10%
Guiliani-3%

What jumps out at you? Guiliani only got 3%. When they go to other states who is Guiliani going to pull votes from? Not Ron Paul. Huckabee, Romney, Thompson, and McCain are going to have to share some of their votes with Rudy. If Rudy had seriously competed last night Ron Paul would have possibly moved up to 3rd. Thompson and McCain both would have lost votes. Paul only finished 3,500-3,800 votes behind McCain and Thompson. The more neocons competing for the GOP nomination is a good thing for the only Anti-war candidate running.

Get ready New Hampshire is going to be fun and Paul could really play spoiler next Tuesday.

Gift ideas for Fred Thompson supporters

2007-12-19T13:35:00.000-08:00

For the neocon who has everything and hates gay marriage. Do you know someone who has a man-crush on Fred Thompson and is tired of watching him fall all over himself without cue cards? Now you can enjoy Fred Thompson in all his macho-conservative glory, now 100% "Uh" and "Um" free! It's the Fred Thompson Christmas DVD set. Relive some of Fred's greatest acting roles where he got paid a lot of money to pretend like he was a person with a lot of power and responsibility.

Each movie can be purchased for under ten bucks at Amazon.com. That's 2 bucks less than Tom Tancredo's 4th qtr fundraing totals!

Fred's big breakout role as "Big John" the rough, tough NASCAR chief.
http://www.amazon.com/Days-Thunder-Tom-Cruise/dp/B00000ILBL/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1198100869&sr=1-1

Another role in a big blockbuster, Rear Admiral Joshua Painter
http://www.amazon.com/Hunt-Red-October-Sean-Connery/dp/6305182043/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1198098864&sr=1-2

Somehow overlooked in an Oscar-worthy performance big Fred stole the show as FBI agent Dale Grissom.

http://www.amazon.com/Babys-Day-Out-Joe-Mantegna/dp/B00005RT3K/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1198100654&sr=1-1

And who could forget his commanding performance as "Trudeau" the guy in charge of the airport as it is attacked by terrorists.

http://www.amazon.com/Die-Hard-2-Harder/dp/B000O77SRM/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1198100752&sr=1-1

Last minute stocking stuffers,

He may not be our next President but he can put a smile on the face of any God-fearing, Nascar fan. Make sure you bring Fred home for the holidays.

What Ron Paul should do to make himself the frontrunner

2007-12-05T10:25:00.000-08:00

Ron Paul has shot to the top 4, 5, or 6 spot in the GOP primaries depending on which poll you read. I have a few ideas on how he can push himself up to the top.

1. Osama bin Laden-I really think Dr. Paul has it right when it comes to the war in Iraq, but there is one thing that he nor any other Presidential candidates have really discussed. If I was Ron Paul I would hold a press conference tomorrow and announce that after we pull out of Iraq we are going to send our soldiers into Afghanistan and Pakistan and go get Osama bin Laden. This has been one of President Bush's biggest failures. No other candidate has vowed to do this so step up and make it known that you will be the man responisble for catching him "Dead or Alive". When he is criticzed for withdrawing troops from Iraq all he has to say is "Hey, I'm going to get the guy responsible for 9-11."

2. Celebrity endorsements-They don't really mean anything but once you get a few you and your campaign tend to get a little media coverage which is something Dr. Paul is lacking. I heard somewhere John Mayer was backing Paul. After the press conference, listed above, get on a plane and fly to wherever John Mayer is and get him to endorse you. Once you get someone like that more will follow which will help with...

3. MTV-Choose or Lose was huge for Bill Clinton and Dr. Paul's message should do really well with young people especially college students and first time voters. If you could get John Mayer or any other hot music act to perform some shows for you at some colleges-Wow! MTV is also doing something with Myspace about interviewing the candidates. I know McCain and Edwards have already done this but we need to get ourselves on that show ASAP.

4. Running Mate-Michael Bloomberg would be a perfect fit. He has lots of money and wants to take that next step. He wouldn't win if he ran as an Independent but if he joined the ticket he would position himself to be a frontrunner in 4 or 8 years. Bloomberg is a "Independent" who is all over the board on the issues. He was for the war but now has been quoted as saying that it's a different story since Iraq didn't have Weapons of Mass Destruction. He is liberal on some social issues but I think his money and name make a great running mate if he were inclined to run with Dr. Paul. Also, Chuck Hagel from Nebraskawould make a great selection.

5. Be more agressive-The Youtube debates were horrible if you were a Ron Paul supporter. Make a commerical and show how much time you got compared to the other candidates. All you have to say is that the mainstream media doesn't want you to hear my message and then talk about where you stand on the issues. CNN asked Paul what crime a woman who gets an abortion should be charged with then asks Huckabee, Romney, and Rudy if they believe in the Bible. C'mon! Point this stuff out. The next time you are asked if you would support the GOP nominee if you don't win tell them to ask Mitt and Rudy if they would support you if you won the nomination. Turn the tables on them.

I'd love to see Dr. Paul use these and if youo know him or anyone around him pass this along. Go Ron Go!

Would Rudy Guiliani support Ron Paul?

2007-11-01T16:06:00.000-07:00

We've heard it asked several times. Would Ron Paul support the GOP nominee if he doesn't win. Of course he won't he is a man of principle and if someone is running on a platform of more war and more spending why should he support that candidate.

Due to Dr. Paul's success in fund raising the mainstream media has to now cover him to a certain extent. How do they cover him? They try to make him look small and as a traitor to his party. The question of whether or not he would support another candidate is in itself unfair. During the debates the only candidates to be asked that were "lower tier candidates" Paul and Brownback. Why wasn't Fred Tomps"um" or Rudy Guiliani asked? Well it would make them seem inferior that's why. The mainstream media has already selected our GOP nominee for us. Just look at how much time each candidate gets in the debates and on the news. It's basically a Guiliani, Romney, and Thomps"um" show everytime they get on stage. If they can make him seem like a traitor to his party it's just an added bonus.

Why isn't Rudy Guiliani asked if he would he support Ron Paul if he won? I wonder what he would say? He might begrudgingly tow the company line and support him. Chances are he wouldn't though. I bet he would bring up 9-11 and talk about how safe he made New York.

If anyone out there sees him ask him for me okay?

Fred Thompson and um, the um, Florida GOP debate

2007-10-22T14:35:00.000-07:00

Wow, I gotta say I was blown away by Fred Thomps"um" last night. Two months ago Good Ol' Fred was the savior of the Republican party. After two debates he is now fallen behind Mitt Romney, Rudy Guiliani, and depending on which poll you look at Mike Huckabee or John McCain. For a guy who has made his living over the years as an actor you would think that he would be polished and know all the things he wanted to say when it was his turn to speak.

Well, last night I decided to count how many times Senator Thompson said the words "uh" or "um". He was given 8 times to speak last night and the "um" count came to, drumroll please...78! That is a whopping 9.75 "ums" a question. Now I have to admit I have never seen an episode of Law and Order. I did see Die Hard 2 a few months ago and from what I recall he never once said "uh" or um". How is it that a guy who is a member of the screen actors guild can get up in front of an audience and stumble all over himself? Mitt Romney has never been in a movie or a TV show and even he got up there with all his talking points and sounded like the smooth used car salesman that we've all grown accustomed to.

Fred's lost his luster. A few weeks ago after giving a speech he asked the silent audience “Can I have a round of applause?”

So what is going on with Fred? What else is holding him back?

His wife is old enough to be his daughter. That's a little creppy but we'll give him a pass on that one.
Prior to his trophy wife he married and divorced the girl he knocked up in high school.
Even though they had never met Fred served on the advisory board of the legal defense fund for Scooter Libby, the guy who went to jail for not ratting out the Vice President.
He said he doesn't go to church unless he's visiting his mother.
He worked as a lobbyist for an abortion rights group (Fred's pro-life).
He was a lobbyist for a company that paid him $750,000 to get reduced payouts for asbestos-related claims due to criminal negligence.
Oh yeah, he's old.

Fred Thompson reminds me of that Quarter Pounder with Cheese combo meal you see on the commericials. Its looks really big and juicy. You can harldy wait to sink your teeth into it. Then you order it and it's a lot smaller than you had hoped, really greasy and the fries are stale. Good Ol' Fred looked really good when you saw him on Law and Order. Now that he is a candidate for President it's time to vote for someone else.

How Ron Paul wins the GOP nomination

2007-09-26T15:56:00.000-07:00

A few months ago I had no idea who Congressman Ron Paul was. That all changed after the first Republican debate back in early May.

I had originally tuned in that night because I am a political junkie and I find politics and government very fascinating. I figured it would turn out with me wanting to throw something at my television because all 10 guys on the stage would say how we were going to win in Iraq and how they would try to scare me into voting for them. But something else happened. Something really big happened. For the first time in my life I was truly inspired by a Politician. I was shocked to hear a guy tell the truth and say what he truly believed instead of whatever he had to say to get elected. That night was introduced to Ron Paul.

Congressman Ron Paul is an obstetrician and served as a captain in the Air Force during the 1960's. He is against Abortion and for smaller governement. He is also one of the only Republicans to vote against the Iraq war in 2002. He has had a consistent voting record for over 16 years. You can see it here;
http://www.ontheissues.org/TX/Ron_Paul.htm

As you may already know the mainstream media doesn't cover Ron Paul very much. When they do it's usually negative. When he was interviewed by George Stephanophlous of ABC News he was told that he had no shot of winning. The secret is that the big corporations that own CNN, CBS, NBC, etc. don't want him to win. These same corporations are scared to death that Ron Paul would get elected and return the power back to the people instead of them. Would you like to see who the leaders of the corporations are donating money too?

Rudy Guiliani,
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/sector.asp?id=N00009908&cycle=2008

Mitt Romney,
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/sector.asp?id=N00000286&cycle=2008

Did you see a pattern there? Did you see the millions of dollars coming from the financial/real estate sector? Several millions. Now look at Ron Paul's

http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/sector.asp?id=N00005906&cycle=2008

Congressman Paul also has some from the finance/real estate sector but did you notice it's in the thousands not millions like Romney and Guiliani. Also most of Paul's donations come from the category "other". That means regualr folks like you and I. Who do you want as President? Someone who owes favors to rich guys in charge of Multi-Billion dollar corporations? Not me.

Now on to my original point. Ron Paul CAN win the Republican nomination. What does Tom Tancredo, Sam Brownback, Fred Thompson, Mitt Romney, Mike Huckebee, Rudy Guiliani, Duncan Hunter, John McCain, and Alan Keyes all have in common? They are all pro-war. What was the biggest issue in the 2006 election? The war in Iraq. The GOP lost the majority in the Senate and Congress because of the war. Who is the only Republican who against the Iraq war? That's right, Ron Paul.

The people who vote in the primary are Republican and are there to elect a Republican to run against the Democrat nominee. The problem for the GOP candidates is that there are too many candidates running. This is where Ron Paul has an advantage. Let's say that at the first primary in New Hampshire (a liberal and anti-war state) that Ron Paul does a good job getting the youth and anti-war voters to the polls and winds up with 15% of the vote. In 2000 238,606 people voted in the New Hampshire primary. If Congressman Paul wins 15% that's 35,790 votes that cannot go to the other candidates. We will now say that the bottom tier candidates ;Brownback, Keyes, Hunter, and Tancredo receive 15% of the total vote. That's 35,790 other votes not going to the front runners. That leaves 167,026 votes in play to be split among five other candidates. 167,026 divided by 5 comes out to 33,405. Which is less votes than they number that Ron Paul would have.

I'm not naive to believe that the 5 front-tier candidates would split that number of votes evenly. But even if the front runner received 25% of those votes it would make Ron Paul the runner-up and force the media to cover him as a first-tier candidate. On any stage Congressman Paul wil make any other nominee look foolish. All he needs is an avenue to get his message out which this scenario would provide. Also, you will see other canidates bow out. This may or may not benefit Paul. But you also have to believe that more than 238,606 people will be voting in this primary which will probably benefit Paul the most. We've already seen he is good at organizing and being the only Anti-War candidate he has a good chance at turning out the vote.

It's a long-shot but not as long as it used to be. This scenario is not that far fetched. Watch next week to see how much money in donations Paul has raked in during the 3rd quarter. This campaign may be on the verge of something huge.

Mitt Romney and the Iowa $traw Poll

2007-08-12T08:11:00.000-07:00

Isn't democracy great? The GOP has an event like the Iowa straw poll where if you want to vote for your favorite candidate you have to pay 35 bucks. Isn't it ironic that the man who has the most money won the event? Mitt Romney grabbed 31% of the vote and said that he was what the people of the heartland were looking for in a candidate. He didn't win anything. He paid for people to come vote for him. And now he will be on Fox and CNN 24/7 and other candidates will not get a platform to share their ideas for the country.

Mike Huckabee did very well considering he doensn't have the deep pockets that Govenor Romney does. He will not win but he probably put himself in the running for the VP slot on the ticket.

Brownback and Tancredo didn't accomplish anything by finishing 3 and 4. They are an afterthought and will be lucky if they are considered for the VP spot on the ticket.

It's really sad that Ron Paul gets little to no media coverage. He raked in over 9% of the vote and he didn't even advertise or set foot in the state until the week before the Straw Poll. If he was treated with respect by the mainstream media he would be treated as a contender. In his speech yesterday he said that we are fixing bridges in Iraq while the ones over here are crumbling. He's on to something. I really wish that he had a shot.

Tommy Thompson and Duncan Hunter are through. They'll be pulling out soon freeing up more debate time for Guiliani and Romney.

Fred Thompson, McCain and Guiliani did not even compete so they didn't win or lose anything. McCain should have tried to compete. His campaign needs a shot of momentum but I think he knew that Romney had already bought and paid for the end result. I hope Guiliani doesn't win the nomination. If 9-11 never happened he would be a partner in a law firm somehere but now he's telling us that he was at ground zero just as much as the rescue workers. He's worthless and will continue to exploit 9-11 as far as he can take it. Fred Thompson was in Die Hard 2. Who cares?

It's just plain wrong that the guy who has all the money can buy a victory at the straw poll and all the press that comes with it. Our country deserves a leader with the best ideas not the deepest pockets.

Sizing up Hillary, Obama and the rest of the Democrats running for President

2007-08-11T12:39:00.001-07:00

After watching the debate the other night I was thinking where do these candidates stand? Are they really running for President or are some just trying to make a name for themsleves so they could be considered for the Vice President slot on the ticket. I'll give my analysis on each candidate below;

1. Hillary Clinton-She's pretty much all or nothing. I believe she is too proud to take the VP spot if asked, it would seem like a demotion.

2. Barak Obama-He is a contender for the Nomination but could also be a top contender for VP. I like what James Carville said about him. He has spice but he needs some seasoning. He is rather young and new to the national stage. If he doesn't win it all he should accept the Vice Presidential nomination if offered because the Democrats should win this election and in 8 years this would set him up as the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination (2016).

3. John Edwards-He's all or nothing. He has about a 30% chance of winning the nomination but as a VP pick it's not going to happen. He accepted the spot on Kerry's ticket and he won't do that again, nor will he be asked.

4. Joe Biden-This is the guy I like, he has no realistic shot at winning but he would be as safe as a pick for VP as anyone running. He knows foreign policy like the back of his hand and has been to Iraq and Darfur countless times. He has a 50/50 shot at being VP as long as he doesn't come after Hillary and Obama too hard during the debates.

5. Bill Richardson-I don't like this guy. He just seems full of himself and really phony. He will however bring in the Hispanic vote which could be seen attractive as a VP selection. He has no shot at being President but I'd say he has a 25% chance at becoming the Vice President nominee for the aprty.

6. Dennis Kucinich-I think he has done very well in the debates but I believe he's just too liberal to be elected. He would almost be a liability as a VP pick because he is so liberal. I think he has no shot at winning and a very small chance at being the VP pick.

7.Chris Dodd-He just gets lost in the shuffle. He is however the only Democrat running to serve in the Armed Forces. He has been attacking Obama and Clinton a lot so I don't think he has a shot at being VP or President either.

8. Mike Gravel- I like this guy but he has no shot to do anything. He's there to keep things interesting during the debates. I think he and Ron Paul are the only guys running who actually do the right things if elected.

9. Al Gore-I really would like to see him jump in there becasue I believe he could win the wole thing. With the movie, concert, and a possible Nobel Prize in October I think he could be the guy to win it in a blowout. But he doesn't want to run, yet...

Other possible VP candidates,
Wesley Clark, John Kerry, Jim Webb, Phil Bredesen, Evan Bayh

Romney, Guiliani draft-dodging GOP frontrunners

2007-08-09T18:46:00.000-07:00

I have a newfound respect for John McCain. I did a little research and that man is a great American. Check out what this man has been through. Make sure you read about his military career and how Bush beat him for the 2000 GOP nomination. He also stood up to the "Swift Boat Veterans" who tried to smear John Kerry. He didn't however stand up to me when I said Kerry was a shitty candidate in 2004.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_mccain

According to Mitt Romney his sons are "showing support for our nation" to help their dad get elected President. Wow, that really makes them great Americans. Too bad their dad and Rudy Guiliani both received defrements so they didn't have to go to Vietnam.

But what about the candidates that served our country? John McCain graduated from the Naval Academy and later served in Vietnam. He was also captured and held as a POW for many years. Duncan Hunter also served in the army during Vietnam. Long-shot Ron Paul was a captain in the Air Force and later volunteered for the National Guard.

How in the hell are the two guys who skipped out on serving our country are now the frontrunners for their parties nomination for President?

Thoughts on YouTube Democratic Debate

2007-08-09T15:57:00.000-07:00

Well I watched the debate on CNN last night and it was rather entertaining. You can go to this link to see how much talk time each candidate got.
http://campaignsandelections.com/sc/articles/index.cfm?id=415

I thought it was a big infomercial for Barack Obama since he receive almost 15 and a half minutes of talk time. I thought it was kinda funny they waited to have his 30 second video to be shown last right before the debate ended so he was the last one you would remember. He also was in the center of the stage. I don't know if that was all coincidence or not but it sure seemed like Obama was the chosen one last night.

I felt really bad for Mike Gravel. He only got 4 minutes worth of talk time during the 2 hour debate. And the one question he got was one that tried to make him look bad. Someone asked him if he wanted to retract the statement he made about all the soldiers in Vietnam that died died in vain. He responded that America has most favored trade nation with Vietnam and you can got to Hanoi and get a Baskin Robbins ice cream cone and Iraq was going to be the same way. And he's right. We went to Iraq to get their oil. I mean we went to Iraq so big corporations who fund our polititcians can get their oil. He also had another question that he tried to respond to and ask Obama about where he's getting his money but Anderson Cooper, the moderator cut him off. He really had a good point about the money that funds the candidates. It's going to be more of the same like he said until we take the power back from the corporations that fund these guys. Gravel isn't taken seriously by CNN and therefore no one else takes him seriously
Hillary Clinton, she did ok. She was par for the course. Nothing really impressed me about her. She and Obama are the front runners so CNN projected her as such with 12 and a half minutes of talk time.

John Edwards, I know he's a snake but he's a likeable snake. CNN tried to throw him under the bus with the basing policy around faith question but he answered it very well. His religious views are against gay marriage but he said he wouldn't force his religion on anyone or allow it to shape policy. He got 10 and a half minutes of talk time. 3rd most amount of talk time for the guy in 3rd place. Seems about right.

Chris Dodd, who cares. No shot.

Joe Biden, If I had to pick one person on stage right now to be President it would be him. He did very well especially when talking about foreign policy. He's been to Darfur. He's also been to Iraq more than any other law maker. He also had a good point about gun control. If you have a mental illness or if you have a criminal record then you don't get a gun. Sounds about right. He also sounds the most presidential and I'd like to see him get more coverage but Clinton and Obama seem to have a stranglehold on all the media. He'd make a very solid VP pick for whoever get's the parties nomination.

Bill Richardson, I don't like him. He just seems full of himself. He also has no shot. He might get a look for VP since he would help bring out the Latino vote. But I hope not.
Dennis Kucinich, I thought he did very well. He was very articulate and made a very good point about putting heat on our Congressmen to end the war in Iraq. Even though he did a very good job communicating his position he's too far to the left and he really has no shot. The whole reperations thing is silly but might help bring out the black vote. Cha-ching!

All in all it was entertaining. It wsa very slanted to make Obama look good and Edwards and Gravel to look bad. I am looking forward to the debate in September and I hope Ron Paul gets to kick ass and take names like he has in the other debates.

The sad thing about this debate is that no one really cares and watches them unless they are really into politics and usually someone like that already has their mind made up as to who they are voting for so what's the point? CNN will say Obama and Clinton won because they are the frontrunners so when Joe Sixpack turns on the news they will hear that Obama and Clinton won so they will vote for one of them.

But don't take my word for it, research and figure out who you like best. Like Mike Gravel said last night. "Wake up People, follow the money." Also, pass this on. People need to be informed. And write me back I enjoy the feedback good or bad.